To: Kaslin
They just had to include that he wasn’t wearing a helmet.
Prayers for the loved ones.
11 posted on
07/06/2015 12:57:48 PM PDT by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: skr
They just had to include that he wasn’t wearing a helmetWoulda been just fine if he had that helmet on, right?
33 posted on
07/06/2015 1:06:29 PM PDT by
dware
(Yeah, so? What are we going to do about it?)
To: skr
Maybe the think if he had been wearing a helment he would noth have been cut in half at the waist
42 posted on
07/06/2015 1:14:16 PM PDT by
Kaslin
(He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
To: skr
But, a helmet would have SAVED HIM!!!!!!
63 posted on
07/06/2015 1:39:09 PM PDT by
WayneS
(Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
To: skr
They just had to include that he wasn’t wearing a helmet. Prayers for the loved ones.Yeah, the helmet would have saved him!
70 posted on
07/06/2015 1:47:21 PM PDT by
Rummyfan
(Let us now try liberty)
To: skr
They just had to include that he wasn’t wearing a helmet.
Wow, talk about propaganda.
If I’m about to be cut in half, I’m pretty sure I’d prefer to have my skull crushed first (dead), or at the very least be unconscious.
91 posted on
07/07/2015 12:29:35 AM PDT by
rikkir
(Anyone still believe the 8/08 Atlantic cover wasn't 100% accurate?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson