Good, cause that's exactly how I feel when I argue with a simpleton who can't keep cause and effect in the proper sequence. Who's history (what little of it he has) is all over the place, and with huge gaps missing in it, but who cannot stop giving us all his morally superior prattle about how much he hates anything and everything connected with slavery, except when the Union did it or condoned it.
When they do it, it's no longer a great moral outrage.
You just can't help yourself.
Re your post #390: You don’t argue honestly. You put words in others mouths and then argue against your own fictions.