Posted on 06/30/2015 7:12:34 AM PDT by CharlesOConnell
The Story Was of the 13 Year Old Girl Who Attacked Another Girl Holding a Toddler, While Other Kids Shouted Out Promptings, Threats and Laughed Approvingly.
The original news story had to mention that the victim was "bi-racial".
What is being implied here?
Isn't that was Rev. Martin Luther King was talking about, referring to "the content of their character"?
We're supposed to move beyond racial stereotyping, of all kinds.
People of a certain ethnic community take on specific consequences when they use a racialistic term for themselves ("calling other people 'the N Word'" with implied authorization because "I'm one of them".)
What does this say about racialism as a self-limiting mental category in today's society?
OK maybe I’m dumb, but could you expand just a bit on the meaning of the phrase “a self-limiting mental category.”
Doesn't matter if there's baby in the lap or baby in the crib.
The original news story had to mention that the victim was "bi-racial".
You are completely missing the approved narative, so let me clarify:
From the protected-class perspective, she is a race-traitor and therefore no hate crime is done.
From the oppressive-majority perspective, it's racist to even be talking about this.
There, much simpler, isn't it? Now go eat your peas...
I think the implication was: “Don’t worry white people, the victim wasn’t white, nothing to see here.” If the attacker was white and the victim was black it would be the national outrage of the week with wall to wall television coverage but since the attacker was black it was not a national outrage, it was not a hate crime and it was not a civil rights offense.
This video went viral on youtube, so the media controllers saw that they had been blindsided by the new media. They head to get out ahead of the crisis so that white America would never see any incidents of white victims of black crime. We are only supposed to see black victims of white injustice, then it becomes a televised national story. That is the narrative that we have been seeing for many years—black victim, white racists. This one went against the narrative so they had to work quickly to change peoples’ perceptions. Whites must always feel guilty.
Here is a guess. By accepting the worldview that I am a victim and therefore deserving of many benefits, I am accepting a passive role in life. Things happen to me, I don’t make things happen. Among other things, that makes getting an education a ‘white thing’ so I remain unread and innumerate. My worldview is what I see around me and what I see on TV. But this is essentially a choice I make. So the mentality is very self-limiting in life due to bad choices I make regarding education, recreation and work.
#mulattolivesdontmatter
“I think the implication was: “Don’t worry white people, the victim wasn’t white, nothing to see here.” If the attacker was white and the victim was black it would be the national outrage of the week with wall to wall television coverage but since the attacker was black it was not a national outrage, it was not a hate crime and it was not a civil rights offense.
This video went viral on youtube, so the media controllers saw that they had been blindsided by the new media. They head to get out ahead of the crisis so that white America would never see any incidents of white victims of black crime. We are only supposed to see black victims of white injustice, then it becomes a televised national story. That is the narrative that we have been seeing for many years—black victim, white racists. This one went against the narrative so they had to work quickly to change peoples’ perceptions. Whites must always feel guilty.”
Quoted for truth!
Have you ever heard of little Antonio Santiago? He was a little one year old white boy who was sitting in his stroller as his mother took him for a walk. Two black teenagers came up to them and demanded money from the mother, she didn’t have any money so one of the “teens” shot the baby right in the face, killing him.
It happened in Brunswick, Georgia. This happened before Trayvon Martin but Obama made no mention of it.
This next story does not cross racial lines but it is horrible just the same. A Haitian immigrant woman went to a storage facility to retrieve her things when a car came by. A black youth came out of the car, grabbed the woman’s purse and shot her dead. I believe this happened in Miami. It was caught on the security camera and was shown on television.
Truly.
the current OccupyWH resident is one after all.
Mulatto lives do matter only if it promotes the narrative.
Just curious: what has this to do with the scumbag Mark Udall?
DEGENERATE CULTURE
To the left the violence doesn’t matter because it is a Negro attacking another person the left is careful to characterize as a half Negro. Is that attitude racism? Nah- not possible. Leftists cannot be racist because they make the definitions.
It’s hard to tell what you’re making up if there’s no link.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.