Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
Ted Cruz is an example, Sarah Palin, both able and qualified.

As I thought, I didn't make myself clear. What pool of able and qualified jurists does any President have from which to nominate candidates for the Supreme Court (or any Federal Court, for that matter)?

The candidate's religion is not to be a qualification for selection; only his/her effectiveness in the law profession is to count.

If there are not a lot of Protestant lawyers interested in the judiciary, there will not be a fair number of Protestants represented in the group, will there?

41 posted on 06/27/2015 9:08:25 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: imardmd1

That was my point with mentioning Palin.

We need to to take the law from the lawyers, they have a whole priesthood thing going, and most of them are incompetent and unqualified to be in their positions, that is why law in America is one of the most incompetent, corrupt, buffoonish, just plain ridiculously cartoonish, sectors of life and government in modern America.


42 posted on 06/27/2015 9:13:26 AM PDT by ansel12 (libertarians have always been for gay marriage and polygamy, gay Scout leaders, gay military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson