Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It’s Time to Legalize Polygamy
Politico ^ | June 26, 2015 | FREDRIK DEBOER

Posted on 06/26/2015 9:57:38 AM PDT by rickyrikardo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: rickyrikardo

Polygamy will be the law of the land in five years or less and child marriage and all forms of plural marriage will be forced on us in ten years or less all by unelected judges. The seeds of another American Revolution have been sown.


21 posted on 06/26/2015 10:43:31 AM PDT by The Great RJ (“Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money.” Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickyrikardo

My neighbor can finally marry his cat.


22 posted on 06/26/2015 10:51:18 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickyrikardo

Anti-polygamy laws violate Muslim rights so they have to go. CARE and Obama will see to it. Christians’ religious freedom can be violated but not theirs.

Notice that sodomites don’t force halal bakeries to bake their wedding cakes or force Muslim photographers to take their pictures. Obama would unleash the full power of the regime on a gay couple who did that.


23 posted on 06/26/2015 11:05:17 AM PDT by tschatski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

What’s next is an additional and expensive “breeding license” for those disgusting hetro-marriages that can result in offspring.


24 posted on 06/26/2015 11:08:46 AM PDT by Ouchthatonehurt ("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rickyrikardo
Well, at least polygamists can have lots of heterosexual kids. Homos can't have any.
There's strength in numbers.

25 posted on 06/26/2015 11:13:18 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickyrikardo

Why not? Cat’s out of the bag.


26 posted on 06/26/2015 11:45:08 AM PDT by cydcharisse (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickyrikardo

Why stop with polygamy? Why not allow all forms of plural marriage and arranged child marriage too not to mention legalizing incest. All the same arguments for gay marriage apply.


27 posted on 06/26/2015 12:49:55 PM PDT by The Great RJ (“Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money.” Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickyrikardo

It’s Time to Legalize Polygamy and marry your dog and cat and donkey too.... Hollywood is gonna love this. It makes them look normal.


28 posted on 06/26/2015 1:20:50 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickyrikardo

The slippery slope started long ago when marriage was effectively redefined from a sacred covenant relationship centered on the nuclear family to a branch of contract law. Cohabitation, divorce, unwed motherhood were once scandalous conditions that carried significant social stigma with them. Today’s ruling is merely a natural progression of the ongoing redefinition of marriage that has been in progress for the past 50+ years. To believe that this won’t continue is naive in the extreme.

Now that it has been decided that “marriage” is whatever we choose to say it is and is purely a contract with no larger significance, things can accelerate. Polygamy and plural marriages of whatever number and mix of sexes is the next logical step and will arrive with stunning swiftness. I fully expect the first court cases extending the new definition of marriage to plural arrangements to be decided by next year.

Beyond this, incest is the next step. Just consider the tax advantages of being able to “marry” one’s elderly parent(s) and enjoy full spousal inheritance rights with no estate taxes to worry about. The government may fume, but there’s simply no legal basis for opposing this because we all know that it’s all about #lovewins.


29 posted on 06/26/2015 1:48:07 PM PDT by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I know of only 1 major religion (if you call it that) allows polygamy and only for males to have upto 4 wives. You guessed it, it is the “religion of peace”.


30 posted on 06/26/2015 9:18:52 PM PDT by entropy12 (I always see glass half full. I see something good in all people, even the crappy RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

There was one man in Australia with 64 wives and hundreds of children. He was paid millions in welfare money.


31 posted on 06/26/2015 9:20:25 PM PDT by entropy12 (I always see glass half full. I see something good in all people, even the crappy RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

If guys can be gals and white chicks can be black chicks and any change can be “transed” and then you are whatever you choose to be ... I have no doubt that marriage will be twisted and turned to mean any configuration.


32 posted on 06/26/2015 9:56:42 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson