Replies

It's a question of commitment and resources. The Bushes had the resource but (unlike the Democrats) not the commitment to make 50-50 appointments. Levin & Cruz lacked the basic opportunity and resources to expose leftwing moles like Souter & Roberts.

You are very ill-informed.

I have heard Levin talk about this. The vetting is extremely thorough. Cruz worked with Roberts, side-by-side for years.

But you want to live in your little make-believe world that you can figure this out ahead of time. Enjoy.

As Jacquerie says in post 29, it seems as if they become corrupted when they get there.

"You are very ill-informed."

Explain the fact that Democrat appointments are 100% leftwing loyalists FOREVER and the Bush family appointments are 50-50!

You claim that the Bush appointment "become corrupted when they get there."

I say the Bushes are corrupted by liberalism before they get there. But listing Daddy Bush's and Bush the 2nd's liberal and globalist words, actions and associations would take more than one post or even an entire thread.

In any case, they have been more than sufficiently exposed on FR for many years. Any "FReeper" who ignores that exposure and writes in favor of the Bushes is willfully either ignorant or deceitful.