Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Supreme Court Justice John Roberts Blackmailed?
the blaze ^ | Jun. 25, 2015 11:59am | Wayne Root

Posted on 06/25/2015 12:06:44 PM PDT by Cowman

Is the idea implausible that this same Obama administration that orders IRS attacks, then orders destruction of key evidence, would stop at nothing to save Obama’s signature achievement? Is it impossible to believe that Obama and his socialist cabal that learned from Saul Alinsky that “the ends justify the means” would hold something over a Supreme Court justice’s head?

It’s time to ask the question loudly and boldly because something is clearly wrong in Washington, D.C.

Is that the purpose of government agencies like the IRS and the NSA that are abusing our rights – to listen to us, to watch us, to find something we’ve done wrong, and then use it to intimidate, harass, threaten or extort key political figures so that Obama can “fundamentally change America”?

Because something clearly smells rotten in Washington, D.C. Like “the mafia delivering a dead fish to your door” rotten. Conservatives just won national elections in a massive wave, a historic landslide. We control both houses of Congress; we control the Supreme Court, yet we continue to lose every key vote in Congress and every key Supreme Court ruling.

Suddenly when Republicans win elections, elections have no consequences. Doesn’t this seem odd? Doesn’t something smell rotten, like the fix is in?

Justice Roberts voting for Obamacare twice is as likely as me voting to save Obamacare.

Like me, Justice Roberts is a lifelong dedicated conservative warrior. He was appointed by President George W. Bush to become the key conservative vote in important decisions that effect “the fundamental transformation of America.” Justice Roberts was born, raised and groomed for one job in this life – to join that Supreme Court, strike down Obamacare, protect the Constitution and end big government overreach.

Yet he is the man responsible for saving Obamacare – twice.

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: adoption; blackmail; corruption; gay; illegaladoptions; intimidation; johnroberts; obamacare; roberts; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: G Larry

Given how long ago that was, what impact would such a revelation have NOW?


41 posted on 06/25/2015 12:40:36 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

They know they’re making sh*t up.

We know they’re making sh*t up.

They know we know they’re making sh*t up.

We know they know we know they’re making sh*t up.

There is no pretending anymore.

It’s a dictatorship.


42 posted on 06/25/2015 12:40:49 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (The Law is whatever the Oligarchs say it is today. You little people can STFU or get locked up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

The current Pope, not so much.


43 posted on 06/25/2015 12:41:03 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (The Law is whatever the Oligarchs say it is today. You little people can STFU or get locked up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

One of his ‘children’ is a married woman - to a Jamaican construction worker.


44 posted on 06/25/2015 12:42:13 PM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

No, he’s not being blackmailed.

This was a 6-3 decision. There was no need for him to be blackmailed into producing a pro-Obamacare majority. The majority was already there with Kennedy’s vote.

What I will buy is that Roberts joined the majority so he, as Chief Justice, could assign the writing of the decision to himself. There are a lot of interesting, even loaded, statements in his opinion that need to be read and parsed carefully. Mainly to the effect that he doesn’t want SCOTUS to be culpable for Obamacare’s collapse, should many of us be right and it be inevitable.


45 posted on 06/25/2015 12:44:51 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

I can’t imagine that anyone could repossess the kids of John Roberts. And I have to assume that Roberts is a good enough lawyer to know that.


46 posted on 06/25/2015 12:44:57 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

FWIW, I’m beginning to suspect bears are using public toilets.


47 posted on 06/25/2015 12:50:04 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowman; mickie; pax_et_bonum; Maine Mariner; flaglady47; danamco; Bob Ireland; M Kehoe; ...
Roberts is probably on his way to the Spanish Riviera to lay low from the American heat for a while, laughing all the way to his preferred luxury vacation spot.

Why is he undoubtedly laughing? It's because he couldn't give a hoot about us peons wasting time, energy and bandwidth on never-ending allegations of "illegal adoptions".

He knows very well that no one can or will or even try to prove anything regarding this issue. He's safely in his appointed office for life ....and he's got plenty of money to plane to Spain while we poor suckers can't even afford to vacation three nights in downtown Anaheim.

No, he votes the way he does now, not because of "blackmail", but because he was a dedicated closet liberal to begin with who finally decided to out himself at the time of his previous anti-Constitution perfidy.

He's not worried a whit about "blackmail" rumors any more than I'm worried about about myself joining the Green Party USA.

He's an evil man, with more treacherous votes to come in the ensuing decades.

He shouldn't be able to cop out with the excuse he's a blackmail "victim" because "he adopted two darling, innocent children".

In fact, he probably appreciates these rumors no end.

Leni

48 posted on 06/25/2015 12:50:09 PM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

Someone found the pics of him with the donkey?


49 posted on 06/25/2015 12:51:20 PM PDT by SMARTY ("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

“I can’t imagine that anyone could repossess the kids of John Roberts”

Maybe, maybe not but he could be disbarred and prosecuted for a crime.

Irish law is very specific. No Irish children can be adopted by non Irish citizens or taken out of the country. There are no exceptions.

Roberts is not an Irish citizen and he has two Irish kids here in America so you tell me.

The records are sealed but the theory is that Roberts got two Irish women who had given birth illegitimately to leave Ireland with the kids and travel to South America ( I forget which country) and then give them up for adoption to Roberts down there and then go back go Ireland.


50 posted on 06/25/2015 12:51:42 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

There were “shenanigans” in the way Roberts adopted his Irish children — the pregnant mothers were flown to Brazil to give birth, and turn the children over to Roberts. Just the fact that he was able to find health white children to adopt is very suspicious.

Did Roberts buy his children? Did he enslave the mothers? Are the fathers disappeared or otherwise cut out?


51 posted on 06/25/2015 12:53:02 PM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

So the future of the US and US health care is held hostage by those kids?


52 posted on 06/25/2015 12:53:19 PM PDT by SMARTY ("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Cowman
Was he blackmailed w/ illegally obtained NSA eavesdropping? Or was he just brownmailed by the very rich and/or very powerful enemies of USConstitution, foreign and domestic?
53 posted on 06/25/2015 12:54:43 PM PDT by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

Would not surprise me. Or as I suspect Roberts was never a conservative in the first place.


54 posted on 06/25/2015 12:57:45 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

“And about the FBI files that the Clintons weren’t supposed to have”

Yep, 900 of them. And those were the raw files, the ones only the adjudicator is supposed to see.

A Nixon subordinate went to jail for having a single one of those files; but nothing happened to Satan’s disgusting bitch for having 900 of them. And I’ll bet her stash is even larger now.


55 posted on 06/25/2015 12:59:20 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

In a word no. Roberts is a plutocrat. He cares not one whit what the law or citizenry says or thinks. He along with the rest of the plutocracy knows best so shut up and bend over. If Democrats controlled Congress Roberts would have been with Scalia. His deference to Congress bs means he defers only if liberals who passed this crap control Congress.


56 posted on 06/25/2015 1:03:07 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

Is a bear Catholic?

Does the Pope crap in the woods?

The answer is perfectly obvious in each instance.

Reason and logic have left the room.

Louis XVI reigned over a more rational and justice-driven regime.

Until he did not any longer.


57 posted on 06/25/2015 1:05:00 PM PDT by alloysteel ("Before I refuse to take your questions, I have an opening statement..." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

I have concluded that Traitor Roberts is just pure evil.


58 posted on 06/25/2015 1:13:00 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

The NYT spiked that when they realized that if Bush is going to get a Justice of his choosing. It will be one the democrats can have by the balls.


59 posted on 06/25/2015 1:17:15 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

No statute of limitations on Child Trafficking.


60 posted on 06/25/2015 1:17:51 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson