Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Talisker

So any old loony theory rates the “science” moniker?

What happened to empirical evidence?


51 posted on 06/17/2015 4:09:56 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
So any old loony theory rates the “science” moniker? What happened to empirical evidence?

That's what's been discussed. What hasn't been provided, is adequate empirical evidence that we went. Too many things don't add up, too much malice and contempt and abuse is dished out instead of examination, reply, rebuttal and respect.

The President of the United States has declared NASA to be a Muslim outreach program. Hillary is running on pure corruption AS corruption. We've got GOPe candidates telling us that they are strong Republicans who want the Mexican Border wide open. We have major government representatives nodding their heads that men can be women, and whites can be blacks if they feel like it.

But when it comes to the moon, the entirety of the government and media complex told the truth so purely that rays of light beamed down from heaven, and discrepencies in their stories are merely worthy of contempt.

And though the moon could have provided massive economic and techonolgy and employment development, we never went back in a half-century because... you know why? I'll tell you why. Because asking that question isn't American, you heretic. So shut up.

53 posted on 06/17/2015 4:20:10 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson