Posted on 06/11/2015 11:11:05 PM PDT by nickcarraway
This week, the U.S. women begin their quest to win the World Cup, a feat they haven’t accomplished since July 10, 1999. More than 90,000 people attended the match that day at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, California, while 40 million watched on TV. I watched, too, from a stuffy, third-floor apartment in a Somerville triple-decker; I covered my eyes as Brandi Chastain buried her penalty kick in the goal’s top-right corner, lifting the U.S. to victory over China.
As a player, I didn’t have one thousandth of Mia Hamm’s talent, but how her team captured my imagination. Sally Jenkins, of the Washington Post, said it best in the HBO documentary, “Dare To Dream”: “Everybody forgot that they were chicks … the idea that these were athletes, as opposed to female athletes.”
Women have been fighting for lasting equality in sports ever since.
American sports fans prefer their superstars to look like superheroes (LeBron James is worthy of a Marvel comic). But the U.S. women’s national team, with their shocks of blond hair, long ponytails and blue fingernails, could be mistaken for faster and fitter versions of normal people. As my husband, a dedicated women’s soccer fan, said, “They look like girls I went to high school with.” Don’t be fooled: These women are far from normal. They are finely tuned, exquisitely trained machines.
But the women’s team just isn’t getting the attention or respect it deserves. Especially if you compare it to the promotion the U.S. men — a thoroughly mediocre team, at least by global standards — received in the run-up to the World Cup last year (see: “I believe that we will win”).
I do not begrudge the American men the spotlight, but the facts are hard to ignore: Their best-ever result in a World Cup was third, in 1930. In more recent memory — the 2010 and 2014 tournaments — they’ve barely made it to the knockout stage.
The U.S. women, meanwhile, are consistently among the best teams on the planet. They’ve won the World Cup twice (in 1991 and 1999) and made it to the semifinals in all six women’s World Cup tournaments. In between, they’ve also won four Olympic gold medals. (This year FiveThirtyEight gives the U.S. a 26 percent chance of winning the whole shebang, second only to Germany, at 32 percent.).
The pay disparity between men and women, while deplorable overall, is even worse in professional soccer. Abby Wambach — the heart and soul of the American team and the all-time international leading scorer for men and women — made about half of what the U.S. men’s captain did (bonus points if you know his name).
And don’t even get me started on FIFA, soccer’s international governing body. In addition to being a corrupt organization (as we now know all too well), it’s also one of the most sexist. In a recent piece in The Guardian, Penny M. Venetis, executive vice president and legal director of Legal Momentum, called the gender discrimination at FIFA “extreme enough to violate the law in almost every country where FIFA tournaments are played…”
The current women’s team hasn’t been ignored, not exactly. They have received some media exposure: a recent New York Times profile on veteran Wambach, a Sports Illustrated cover and a new flashy spot by Nike. But by and large, the world’s biggest women-only sporting event feels like a secret — a cute sideshow relegated to the backlogs of espnW. There’s no official Women’s World Cup app, for example, and the tournament isn’t even included in apps made by FIFA, ESPN or Fox Sports (the network broadcasting this year’s Cup). ESPN’s preview show last Friday night was delayed an hour and a half, to accommodate the end of a college baseball game (and not even a good one: the Florida Gators beat the Florida State Seminoles 13-5).
One could reasonably argue that more attention is given to the men’s World Cup than the women’s, because the men draw more viewers, and more advertising dollars. That may be true, but in the U.S., the argument isn’t airtight. The 1999 women’s final is the second most-watched match in American history (just behind the 2014 U.S. men-Portugal game), and more people watched the 2011 World Cup final between the U.S. and Japan than the Kentucky Derby. Excitement around the women’s national team has given birth to three professional leagues, including today’s Women’s Premiere Soccer League (WPSL). And the women’s team — especially that 1999 team — played a huge role in inspiring kids, and girls in particular, to play soccer. According to Youth Soccer, player registration jumped from 2.3 million in 1995 to over 3 million by 2000, and enrollment has continued to rise.
The summer of 1999 seems like a lifetime ago. But now, as the mom of 17-month-old twin girls, I have even more reason to seek out examples of tenacity and strength, especially when it feels like the most prominent expression of womanhood is posing for the cover of Vanity Fair.
Canada will play host to 24 national teams over the next month, with the final scheduled for July 5 in Vancouver. In spite of a lawsuit brought by players against FIFA and the Canadian Soccer Association, teams will play the entire tournament on turf, a rubber and plastic surface that’s hotter (20 to 30 degrees by some estimates) and tougher on players’ bodies. No matter. Wambach will spear countless balls off her forehead. Megan Rapinoe will send balls sailing the length of the pitch. Christie Rampone will chase down breakaways, because at 39 (and a mother of two), she’s still one of the fastest people on the field. Let’s celebrate these players not for being women, but for being powerful athletes. Watch them run, sweat and tackle.
Tell the author they’d get more attention if they played naked.
well...yeah...
barf. just barf. boo hoo, people don’t get excited about women sports. poor widdle us. it must be sexism. unfair. penalty flag.
crap like this makes it easy to ignore them even more. they don’t deserve it. plenty of sports had tiny followings for a very, very long time. the players played not to be adored, not to say “look at me!”, they played because they loved what they did.
if you play sports for “equality” you ain’t doing it for the right reasons.
For criminal sake who pays any attention to soccer no matter which sex is playing?
Foreigners here.
Who forgot? Who even gave a sh*t? I've said before, the only thing more boring than soccer is women's soccer and I will go out of my way to avoid this mini-media frenzy over the Women's World Cup. Besides, the US Open starts next Thursday.
How about yourself, Mom?
However, that explanation doesn't satisfy the feminist need for victim status.
Well, then let's just cancel it!
That is a big issue; the women’s game is much slower, and the players are a lot less talented. I’ve watched a few of the games, and you see a lot more passes to nowhere (or outright to the other team) than you’d ever see in a men’s World Cup game. The difference in athletic ability is stark.
The 1999 victory was used to promote a women’s professional league (which folded shortly afterwards); I believe they attempted another one, and that folded as well. Unlike the WNBA (which is funded by wealth transfers from the NBA), there is little money in the men’s leagues in the US (MLS and NASL) - so there is nothing to prop up women’s soccer.
It doesn’t help that the US team looks like a gay pride event...
It is nice to watch two Scandinavian teams play...even if the play is boring you’ll hope for overtime...
The men are only better athletes because they were socialized to be better athletes?
“But the women’s team just isn’t getting the attention or respect it deserves. Especially if you compare it to the promotion the U.S. men — a thoroughly mediocre team, at least by global standards — received in the run-up to the World Cup last year (see: “I believe that we will win”).
I do not begrudge the American men the spotlight, but the facts are hard to ignore: Their best-ever result in a World Cup was third, in 1930. In more recent memory — the 2010 and 2014 tournaments — they’ve barely made it to the knockout stage.”
That’s just stupid. Promoting the women’s team does not mean you need to knock the men’s team down a peg as the author does. Besides, it’s just silly to call the U.S. men’s team “thoroughly mediocre” at this point in time. And, saying that they “barely” made it to the knockout rounds in 2014 ignores that they did so by making it out of the toughest group in the tournament. So, again, just a stupid article.
Even in Soccer crazy Norway I had to look hard to find the Norway-Thailand score (Norway 4-O btw.) Norway has one at least 2 World Cups. The reaction still is meh. The men’s team here is definetly mediocre and their games are on TV against soccer superpowers like Albania and Montenegro. /s
Put the women on the unisex soccer team.
But don’t be surprised when the Islamist player insist that the women sit on the bench.
Tell her that I ignore men’s world cup soccer just as much.
Will Women’s World Cup teams allow transgendered men to play or are they still oppressively cis-gendered sexist?
The facts are the average female is not nearly as interested in sports as the average male. It is NOT!! the male's obligation to watch sports he doesn't like to watch.
On a basketball forum I frequent the subject of lack of attention to female pro players was broached. I opined that their potato sack uniforms might have something to do with it. If I can be so crudely male chauvinistic and sexist, men like to see a little leg on females.
My remark was met by a chorus of posters who called me a sexist (rightly so) who said men should watch the women play no matter how they were dressed. These people are living in a bizarro world. Men will NOT!! watch women they deem unattractive play sports. Thems the facts...sorry if it offends some people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.