Replies

Really, you are the one that needs to use some real thinking. You evolutionists never seem to deal with the absurd assumptions you must have faith in.

Your ilk seem to believe that somehow a creature came alive from non-living chemicals and that somehow became self-replicating. From that both sexes evolved.

You then have to have these two 'creatures' be able to mate. As this living thing 'evolves' at each juncture both sexes must evolve in a very short time in history, in the same place and the new mutated evolution must be beneficial to not be rejected. Then somehow these must add or subtract chromosomes because the number vary greatly. No mechanism or explanation is ever offered, these things a taken by faith.

This miracle of impossible odds must happen not only once but tens of thousands of times just in the animal world alone. Add in the insects, and fish and the numbers only become more absurd.

Evolutionists never offer a clue about the variety of plants arose, and assume it just happens too. How does a seed 'sprout' an evolutionary change?

I also note you did not address chemical evolution. This too is assumed. Creating gold from lead in a lab? That's child's play. Explain how the table of the elements were created..

No sir, I think believing in fairy tales is your right. Go ahead and keep on laughing. I quit believing in evolution at 14 when I asked, "You want be to simply believe all that?... just on faith?" Funny, my father was a teacher in atomic theory to Annapolis grads and he admitted long ago your 'proofs' are just smoke.

Keep laughing for now, one day you will see it too.

It's a shame your father had so little understanding of what he was teaching, and imparted his ignorance to you.

There is actually not a single statement in your entire post that corresponds to any theory, past or present. It's simply a collection of nonsense.

In all the years I've been listening to Creationist bilge, I've never heard of anything as stupid as "chemical evolution." Not only is the manner in which this happened thoroughly understood, even the relative abundances of the most basic of the elements are completely predicted by statistical thermodynamics to within a few hundredths of a percent from something that happened fourteen billion years ago.

There are many books on basic cosmology that explain the formation of elements both in consequence of the Big Bang, and subsequent formation of later elements in the hearts of stars. Again, stop believing the universe is a haunted house, and avail yourself of the materials available.