Sounds like dangerous place.
I was watching the Science Channel last week and it was explained thusly: The past must be consistent with the future. Therefore the future affects the past in that sense. The Universe will necessarily end in a particular way (the Big Crunch, the Big Rip, etc.), and whatever happens in the past must be consistent that ending. Similarly, you cannot go back in time and kill your own father when he was a little boy. You know he exists in the future and the past must be consistent with that. Therefore, you could not kill him in the past. The future affects the past.
No, and also, No.
The experimenter is engaged in an exaggeration that ultimately invalidates what he's said. There is nothing new in what has been done, and, as pointed out already, the result was completely predicted by the great American physicist, John Archibald Wheeler.