Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Old Teufel Hunden
As for Lord Nelson’s quote about a ship attacking a fort, I wonder if he would change his mind if he had an aircraft carrier. They and submarines changed the whole character of naval warfare.

When Nelson made that statement, ships did not carry guns powerful enough to readily knock down fortress walls, while forts had guns much bigger than a ship could carry.

I wonder what his thoughts would be upon seeing a WW2 battle ship with 16" guns able to toss a 1,000 pound explosive shell several miles?

102 posted on 05/28/2015 8:44:27 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

Go to Ft. Pulaski outside Savanah GA to see the effects circa 1863 rifled cannon had against the kinds of forts Nelson described.

Then think of what a single broadside of 16” superheavy armor piercing shells travelling at Mach 2 after being fired from an Iowa Class BB would have. Followed up by a broadside of HE shells.

THEN think of what a dozen 2000lb JDAM penetrators dropped from six F/A-18s operating from a carrier several hundred miles away (if not more, with inflight refueling) would have.


110 posted on 05/28/2015 8:58:07 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625
I wonder what his thoughts would be upon seeing a WW2 battle ship with 16" guns able to toss a 1,000 pound explosive shell several miles?

2,700 lb shell over 20 miles. Dad was a (Iowa class) battleship officer.

Sorry, couldn't help it.

126 posted on 05/28/2015 10:13:41 AM PDT by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson