Now I’m a bit unclear...(not being negative or snarky) could you clarify your opinion as to the implications as to why the attorneys in question declined to be the attorneys of record? Do you think they saw the case as being potentially a downer to their reputations if they took the case? Could their records have been supoena’ed in some future case if one or the other had been the “attorney of record”?
I do not know why they both declined to be the attorneys of record. To avoid having their names attached to defending the accused so as not to appear to condone or excuse the behavior, or be a target? Because they felt sorrier for the girls than Josh? Because they found out the case was more complicated than on the face? I don’’t know...