Did Hillary support UN policy that would have criminalized Pamela Geller’s ‘Draw Muhammad’ contest?

The Blaze ^ | May. 18, 2015 12:07pm | Benjamin Weingarten

[bob_denard]

Presumed Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush was recently asked about the “Draw Muhammad” contest in Garland, TX that was attacked by two jihadists, and what Mr. Bush thought of event organizer and ardent counterjihadist Pamela Geller.

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was not, but a new book gives insight into how she might think about the issue given her support as Secretary of State of a policy put forth by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) at the UN that comes into direct conflict with the First Amendment.

As Maj. Stephen Coughlin (Ret.) writes in his “Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad,” which we discussed at length here, the OIC put forth a “Ten-Year Programme of Action to Meet Challenges Facing the Muslim Ummah in the 21st Century” approved in December 2005, one section of which dealt with “Combatting Islamophobia.”

[Flintlock]

Lemmie see, now.................

One “religion?” chops off the heads of the members of OTHER religions it manages to capture.

Some other guys draw CARTOONS of that first “religion’.

Which one of these is the bad guys? Which one do we oppose, which one MUST BE SHUT UP at all costs?

I ferget.

[Ken H]

How about a ‘Draw Mohammed’s Wife’ contest?

[MrB]

Leftists love Islam because both seek to eliminate Christian belief from the earth.

[Rusty0604]

Normally “incitement to violence” would mean rallying people on your side to commit violence. The Islamist reverse the meaning, saying that if anyone just peacefully says or does anything they don’t agree with, they have no control over their own behavior and are incited to violence.

[Ge0ffrey]

Someone should ask Hillary if Conan and his writers should be arrested for doing a sketch w/ Jesus on a surfboard.

[skinkinthegrass]

*