Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Education Secretary Backs Public Boarding Schools: ‘Certain Kids We Should Have 24/7’
Cybercast News Service ^ | May 12, 2015 | 3:03 PM EDT | Penny Starr

Posted on 05/13/2015 9:08:14 AM PDT by Olog-hai

Education Secretary Arne Duncan on Tuesday proposed the idea of public boarding schools, saying there are “just certain kids we should have 24/7.”

“One idea that I threw out … is the idea of public boarding schools,” Duncan said at the National Summit on Youth Violence Prevention in Crystal City, Va. “That’s a little bit of a different idea—a controversial idea—but the question is do we have some children where there’s not a mom, there’s not a dad, there’s not a grandma, there’s just nobody at home? There’s just certain kids we should have 24/7 to really create a safe environment and give them a chance to be successful.” […]

“I think all of our schools should be community centers,” Duncan said. “Our schools should be open 12, 13, 14 hours a day with a wide variety of after-school programming. Thankfully, in the vast, vast majority of communities around the nation, our schools are actually safe havens. … [There’s] very little violence happening in schools. The vast majority is on the streets. If we could keep our kids there longer, we think that makes a lot of sense.” …

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Education; Society
KEYWORDS: arneduncan; boardingschools; communism; moemoney; momoney; moremoney; publicboardingschool; publicschools; wehaveyourchildren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: Olog-hai
First two thoughts:

Your kids belong to us.

and

It Takes a Village. .

21 posted on 05/13/2015 9:26:51 AM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only Hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai; All
THIS is America's Future if you Don't Act!

Help End FReepathons by Donating Monthly! Generous FReeper Sponsors are donating $10 for every New Monthly Donor! Please Sign Up today!


22 posted on 05/13/2015 9:27:18 AM PDT by KC_Lion (This Millennial is for Cruz!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
"That’s a little bit of a different idea—a controversial idea—but the question is do we have some children where there’s not a mom, there’s not a dad, there’s not a grandma, there’s just nobody at home? There’s just certain kids we should have 24/7 to really create a safe environment and give them a chance to be successful.”

Well, he's talking about - what? - 20 million kids who don't have an intact family? That's a lot of boarding schools. It's an indirect admission of the utter failure of the sexual revolution and the drug culture and their devastating influence on families. It is further proof that the end result of progressivism is a highly regimented anthill society managed by an elite.

But - really - this is the end-game of where their logic takes them. First it was day care, then early childhood education, then extended hours at community centers, now it's 24/7 boarding schools. For anal-retentive social engineers like Arne Duncan, there is literally no point at which they can say, "HERE we must stop, here we can go no further." It is always more and more; that is what "progressivism" is.

The ultimate goal is the institutionalization of an entire society, the ruling elite excepted. They began chipping away at parental rights about thirty years ago, and they are now approaching the point where children will be taken away from their parents and become wards of the state, whether parents like it or not. Duncan is revisiting an idea that was once used against - you guessed it - Native Americans. Progressivism has come full-circle.
23 posted on 05/13/2015 9:27:20 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Obama telegraphed this idea a while back when he said ‘we want all women working’. Sorry, I don't remember exactly when but my thought was ‘yes, so you can control the kids and thus control the parents’.
24 posted on 05/13/2015 9:29:02 AM PDT by originalbuckeye (Not my circus, not my monkeys.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
"And the state has no right to take kids either way."

Any parent that does not support their child is abusing/neglecting the child.

That's prima facie cause to remove the child to an institution that can meet their basic needs.

And it would be no more expensive, possibly LESS expensive that Welfare...which supports the piece of sh!t parent too.

It would also sever as a disincentive to combining poverty and pregnancy...ultimately reducing the number of children in need.

25 posted on 05/13/2015 9:30:17 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Art in Idaho; GraceG; cripplecreek; Publius; Monterrosa-24; annalex
Your kids belong to us.... It Takes a Village. .

CORRECT Art!

That is exactly what the point of this is.

Hillary Spelled it out right there. They need the Youth.

That is way KINDERGARTEN is a GERMAN word, it came from Prussia to raise the child in the state as early as possible

Because in the olden days, when a kid started 1st Grade you were Six sometimes Seven! That is quite old for early indoctrination.

26 posted on 05/13/2015 9:30:47 AM PDT by KC_Lion (This Millennial is for Cruz!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Art in Idaho

Even if this were a great idea (it is not), where would the money come from.

Oh, silly me: The Rich.


27 posted on 05/13/2015 9:35:01 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Leftists, having created the problem with the war on poverty with its perverse unintended consequences, now seeks to solve the problem with more of the same proving out Nathan Bedford's Maxim:

The remedy for failed socialism is invariably more socialism.

One might recall the history of The Carlisle Indian School and the leftist reaction to an undertaking that was motivated by a turn-of-the-century Christian impulse. The left absolutely hates the experiment because it sought to Christianize Indians, civilize them, prepare them for competition in the world and discipline them. Leftists regard that as inappropriate but I suspect their new version of The Carlisle Indian School would have much the same impulse but with all the Christian love carefully laundered out.

The impulse on the left is always the same, to treat people like chickens in a Skinner box and reeducate them according to their values. At least Christians who exposed Indian kids like Jim Thorpe to their school had a decent set of values and a true philosophy. They sought to create a generation of independent people rather than a generation of dependents.


28 posted on 05/13/2015 9:35:23 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Great. They'll be churning out armies of these: Obama Jr. Drill Team
29 posted on 05/13/2015 9:51:46 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Also coming just after Barry bemoaned the rich (other than he and Shelly, apparently) sending their kids to private school.

What he really meant was no kids should be able to attend private schools unless all kids can.


30 posted on 05/13/2015 9:52:17 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Like Hillary, they’re raising a village to take your child. It’s not bad enough that the DNC has its own official pedophilia wing in the NEA. How bad would the abuse become in these camps?


31 posted on 05/13/2015 9:54:09 AM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

You are not that far off of the progressive plan to institutionalize all children and replace all families.


32 posted on 05/13/2015 9:54:36 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

keep the kids away from the union loving public school teachers!


33 posted on 05/13/2015 9:59:22 AM PDT by rrrod (at home in Medellin Colombia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Been predicting this for years. They want the children fully indoctrinated into the govt.


34 posted on 05/13/2015 10:05:18 AM PDT by raybbr (Obamacare needs a deatha panel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I just did some quick figuring and estimate that if they enrolled 5 million kids, it would require $350 billion up-front to build the schools, and about $140 billion a year thereafter for salaries and expenses to operate them. And I was trying to be conservative. In the real world, my figures would probably double.


35 posted on 05/13/2015 10:07:34 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

The Communist Manifesto has “predicted” this for years as well. Not for nothing did they stipulate “(f)ree education for all children in public schools”.


36 posted on 05/13/2015 10:26:13 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

It’s been tried...by the Khmer Rouge!


37 posted on 05/13/2015 10:27:46 AM PDT by Renkluaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Commit your offspring to a government mental-adjustment institution and you no longer have any reason to complain about what the government decides to do with its children.

Stop wimpering. You made your bed...


38 posted on 05/13/2015 10:33:33 AM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

That’s what we’ll get if Hillary “it takes a village” Clinton wins.


39 posted on 05/13/2015 11:03:06 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
[There’s] very little violence happening in schools. 

This guy has never gone on You Tube and done a search for "High School Fight."

40 posted on 05/13/2015 11:10:28 AM PDT by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson