I have no idea what that means. I am definitely not pro-vaccine, but I hate that the anti-vax people keep referring to that Italian case when they used the Wakefield paper as portion of their evidence. How can anyone take that seriously?
If you want to believe the Wakefield paper - and all of its references - was withdrawn without compulsion, threats and/or payoffs from the trillion-dollar vaccine industry, be my guest.
But I advise you to stay away from people selling bridges.