[lquist1]

” Thank you for handing down the edict, we’ll all just mumble our undeserving appreciation and follow your brilliant lead here.

But, aren’t we supposed to vote based on their track record in office, and not on our “feelings?”

Silly me, huh? “

I never said she didn’t have a right to enter the race and compete with the other candidates. I was simply echoing the feelings of another Freeper that she was desperately needed in 2012 and I would have done anything to see her get elected that cycle. This time around, Cruz is filling that void for me and Walker is a decent backup choice. I would no doubt support her wholeheartedly if she made it to the general, but I’m just not all that enthusiastic about her joining this crowded field. But hey, if you want to promote her candidacy (should she decide to run)and her “stellar” track record, I certainly won’t stand in your way.

[Gargantua]

As the only previously elected Republican Executive I know of (with the potential to run in 2016) who used her high office to track down, prosecute and jail her complicitly corrupt predeccessors, Sarah is the only one whose "track record" gives me any hope that, once elected, our next president will use their bully pulpit to do the same with our current crop of felonious dirtbag criminals.

This O'Bunghole cabal is the most treasonous, anti-constitutional bunch of thugs Chicago ever foisted on the rest of U.S., and I'd like to see them do the perp walk.

You think Cruz or Walker is that committed to "principal?" Let's do bookmark this for future reference, shan't we?