Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

Every time a female replaces a male in the military, the overall effectiveness of our forces, declines a touch, today they are about 15%, so the decline has been substantial, and the goal is to reach 50% or more.

Why would the military be SEEKING to replace soldiers and sailors with replacements that are a shorter, lighter, weaker, sicklier, less aggressive, slower moving, more terrain limited, reduced distance traveling, hygienically vulnerable, smaller weight carrying, more prone to injury, version.


12 posted on 04/20/2015 8:58:39 AM PDT by ansel12 (libertarianism's social liberalism, makes conservative limited government, & low taxes impossible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

In my mind its called diluting our society and its going on for so long that that’s exactly what we have now and its not getting any better.


30 posted on 04/20/2015 10:00:14 AM PDT by depenzz ("it isn't a chance you take, its a choice you make")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: ansel12

The are doing this because the Romney boys do not want to serve. Senator Burr’s sons don’t want to serve. The Sununu sons...same thing. Phil Graham’s sons? The Buckley boys? Those that do serve normally take the much safer and easier JAG route (Bush, Pataki, Laxalt, etc.). The poster child for doing it right...? Duane Duncan Hunter..or his dad...or his grandfather. There are not to many examples of those people.


42 posted on 05/27/2015 5:03:18 AM PDT by MSF BU (Support the troops: Join Them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson