[eyedigress]

After the Bush administration’s failure to discover weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, it became abundantly clear that the lack of a debate in Washington was part and parcel of a larger foreign policy failing

Maybe the Democraps should have voted against the resolution on IRAQ. Oh hell no. What short memories these writers have. I recall 25k per family to go into Israel and bomb yourself along with as many folks as possible.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: After the Bush administration’s failure to discover weapons of mass destruction in Iraq,

1) What is Weapons of Mass Destruction? People seem to equate it to only Nuclear materials and ignore CHEMICAL weapons.

2) They DID FIND Chemical Weapons, but for some strange reason, chose not to make their findings known.

We now know that LONG AFTER Bush was gone:

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/bombshell-new-york-times-reports-wmds-found-iraq/

and here:

http://humanevents.com/2014/10/15/the-new-york-times-discovers-wmd-in-iraq/

In this sense, GW BUsh was a failure, not because he did not defeat the enemy, but because he failed to show the vindication for his rationale for going to war in Iraq.