[Talisker]

I had already seen that. So what?

So your dishonesty about it is stark. You based your position on denying it was true. Now you blow it off as irrelevant after remaining silent about it, and you want everyone to drop the subject.

So you were wrong and you knew you were wrong and you hid it, while slandering the genuine combat assessment the cop used, just to support - what? A policy of killing suspects no matter what other conditions are present? Turning the police into mere stormtroopers?

LOL, you're a great guy. Really grand. Yeah, I can see why you want this subject dropped.

[Eagles6]

Read my posts. I never said he was not a combat veteran but the info in the story did not support that conclusion.

What is dishonest about that?

I don't want the subject dropped I just want YOU to quit posting to ME.

We will never agree so what is the point?