I have no idea of what you’re talking about. How are the two cases at all similar?
Attempts at lobbying for their reversal is what I’m talking about.
Although it is true (AFAIK) that no church has accepted money from pro-abortionists for the lobby efforts thereof.
The point is is that lobbying will be unsuccessful in both cases. And openly accepting money from the attackers of religious freedom in any case is a dangerous precedent.
I might also add the attacks on religion by Obamacare, which also will not be successfully lobbied away, in spite of waivers that make people feel comfortable under the law at present.