Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Regal
-- [Probable cause] does not insulate a police officer from liability in a shooting --

Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't.

This is what Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985) says, in part ...

Thus, if ... there is probable cause to believe that he has committed a crime involving the infliction or threatened infliction of serious physical harm, deadly force may be used if necessary to prevent escape, and if, where feasible, some warning has been given.
But this sort of justification does not apply when the shooter is a civilian.
85 posted on 04/07/2015 5:34:32 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Very informative. Thanks for the cite!!!


90 posted on 04/07/2015 5:40:33 PM PDT by Regal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt

So, I guess if I see Charlie Manson running down the street in an orange jumpsuit and leg irons, I wouldn’t be justified in shooting him, but a cop would?


103 posted on 04/07/2015 6:24:40 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson