Apple´s Rotten Reaction To Indiana´s Religious Freedom Law

Investor's Business Daily ^ | 03/30/2015 | Staff

[SandwicheGuy]

That's simply the way it works with deviance and self-loathing.

And there you have it, the money quote; expect no less from these miserable people.

And remember, 'The truth will set you free.'

[MoochPooch]

This is going to get a lot uglier before it resolves. I predict that Tim Cook is going to use that media focus to push Apple to the front of the group of companies -- hell it will be a competition to see which company and which CEO can be the most homosexual-supporting. As if this has anything to do with computers or business.

In his mind, it does. Considering the ferocious competition for his demographic, I get the impression that companies are obsessed now with diversity -- anything left-wing to make themselves appear "cool" and maintain loyalty. I have a feeling, though, that all this will backfire, as it had with Starbucks and the race issue. (I threw out my SB money card; don't plan to go there anymore.)

[Swordmaker]

True, the Indiana law was merely an extension of a law passed 23 years ago (and already enacted by other states). Unfortunately, during that time the Gay Mafia has gotten more vicious.

It's also the result of a very stupid Supreme Court decision in 1997 that absurdly ruled that the FEDERAL RELIGIOUS CIVIL RIGHTS LAW somehow did not apply in the SEVERAL States, contrary to all previous jurisprudence saying it would, just as all other similar civil rights laws have. . . and that the individual states would have to enact their own versions.

What if they required the same thing for racial civil rights? This was a typical 5-4 Liberal Majority decision of the Supremes. . . because it fed their agenda.

[Swordmaker]

That was a lie? Outside of calling everyone “Apple haters”, that was the only actual statement he made on the story, and that was for his little Ping list. And that one statement was wesley-worded, and had no logic as I pointed out.

Another LIE from out of your mouth, VanDeKoik. I have never called "everyone Apple Haters". I have called YOU and a few other very obvious members of the Apple Hate mongering brigade Apple Haters. . . but never "everyone" because they are not. YOU are the one who conflates the specific into the general, making every Apple user into homosexual perverts and stupid "''tards" for deigning to choose a different computer or phone than you do.

He wrote it. If you don’t like what he said, take it up with him.

And exactly what was so heinous about what I wrote in a short blurb in a PING message giving a short description of the contents to invite the members of the list to the thread. It wasn't a treatise. What part of the word "reprehensible" do you fail to comprehend??? Here, asshat, let me help you with your education:

DICTIONARY:
reprehensible |ˌrepriˈhensəbəl| — adjective
deserving censure or condemnation: His complacency and reprehensible laxity.

THESAURUS:
reprehensible — adjective
His conduct was reprehensible: deplorable, disgraceful, discreditable, despicable, blameworthy, culpable, wrong, bad, shameful, dishonorable, objectionable, opprobrious, repugnant, inexcusable, unforgivable, indefensible, unjustifiable; criminal, sinful, scandalous, iniquitous.

My use of that word was quite appropriate. . . and explicit. It carries an exact meaning. "IT DOES NOT MEAN "I SUPPORT TIM COOK'S GAY AGENDA AND ATTACKS ON RELIGION!", which is what you have been telling everyone I have been saying! YOU LYING ASSHAT IDIOT!