Good reminder. There was ZERO risk with Romney, absolutely zilch. It was 100 percent sure that had he won, he'd have sided with the Democrat agenda every time. I know you voted for him, but it is why I voted third party. "Risk is the price you pay for opportunity." There was zero risk with Romney, hence zero opportunity. Indeed, a vote for Romney was a vote for turning the Republican party hard left, absolutely zero risk, totally certain outcome.
*sigh*
Well, I’d phrase it just a little tiny bit different....but I agree in general. With Mitt, it was all risk because there was ZERO REWARD - in the risk/reward equation, there was no win possible.
He was not going to run a rewarding campaign against Obama. Obama won the election the day Mitt scorched the earth with negativity in Florida. Wasn’t obvious at the time, but in retrospect, that’s what happened.
Love to send you my book....about 2012. PM me if interested.