Thank you for making my point more clearly. As I said previously: “Nothing about her skills and abilities. . .it was going to happen. On-time. Period.”
That is playing games, sabotaging bs.
By not insisting on standards means giving HER special treatment and a double-standard, as well as cramming a bs PC agenda into an environment that makes no distinction if you are a man or woman. . if you don't have the right stuff, no amount of pc bs/game-playing is going to save your life and can, and has, led to deaths (see the Hultgreen example above).
You refuse to acknowledge that there existed and still exists, petty little groups of self-important bureaucrats who think they can just game candidate scores at will.
It happens in all trades and professions.
It's called internal corruption.
I've seen in it action in the USAF and in both K-12 and higher education, and also in private business.
I've heard of it happening in all walks of life, including our justice system.
Were you personally offended that you were told to cut the crap, and make absolutely certain you and your peers did nothing to skew “her” training and test results?
Tough.
If it was not already widely known at command level that certain people in your unit were heavily suspected of playing games, and skating disciplinary action with a tiny bit of plausible denial, you wouldn't have been gathered into an auditorium as an entire unit, for a cautionary warning to do your damn job. I "annoyed" several ground crews going through IG inspections, by reporting unauthorized shortcuts and screw-ups, that directly put "my" pilots in unnecessary physical danger during peacetime flight training evaluations. I completely understand your stated position. I also reject it.