[Texas Eagle]

The nine justices will hear a one particular-hour oral argument in a case that raises the situation of how states can let or reject politically divisive messages on license plates with out violating absolutely free speech rights.

Text of the 10th Amendment:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

A) The Constitution obviously does not delegate the power to regulate license plates to the federal government.

B) The states certainly did not delegate the power to regulate license plates to the federal government.

Conclusion: That power is reserved to the individual states; the Supreme Court has no say in the matter.

'Course nobody follows The Constitution anymore anyways.

[Sacajaweau]

The case is about Free Speech...not the Flag itself<people should win. No good reason NOT to have the Flag on the plates.

[DoodleDawg]

Conclusion: That power is reserved to the individual states; the Supreme Court has no say in the matter.

So then what you're saying is that the state of Texas has the right to ban the license plate and you agree with that? First Amendment be damned?

[Cen-Tejas]

Excellent post.

[Scrambler Bob]

‘Course nobody follows The Constitution anymore anyways. —

Slow down. You are using too much logic and too many big words.

We got to get rid of that Constitutional Flag, you know, it’s white privilege.

/s/s/ss/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s