[discostu]

I’m not. I’m pointing out that the idea of chemically reducing a woman’s ability to say no (or anything really) goes way back. We know the concept of “get her drunk and take advantage of her”, and it’s really no different than the date rape drugs. Making it so she can’t say no is making it so she can’t say no, quibbling over the chemical compound used is missing the point.

It’s the target mentality. Some guys see a woman crying and think “ahh, she’s less likely to say no”. Which is why I equate it with any other kind of “taking advantage of her”, because that’s what it is. It’s all the quest to avoid “no” through finding/ making women incapable of it.

[ansel12]

We know the concept of “get her drunk and take advantage of her”, and it’s really no different than the date rape drugs.

You are in the nutcase territory now, you seem to have taken to heart your feminist teachings from college.

This is approaching Andrea Dworkin/Catherine McKinnon, teachings.