Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disabling Russian Tanks

Posted on 03/06/2015 7:37:38 PM PST by Hootowl

This is possibly a dumb suggestion, but why can't the Ukrainians use small drones flying at night to drop thermite grenades on Russian tanks? Would the thermite be able to burn through the armor and into the engine or fuel compartment?


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: Hootowl

1. Drones can carry missiles and bombs. There are no latch points for grenades.
2. Grenades have no steerable fins or guidance control, so they will land wherever their speed, trajectory, time to fall, and the wind and gusts place it. If you hung it by a wire for the drone to drop it, that’s the best you can do.
3. Grenades ignite a set number of seconds after the pin is pulled. There is no proximity sensor or contact trigger to set it off.
4. Assuming the grenade hits the tank, it will bounce at least once, so no guarantee of contact.
5. If the final resting place is in a specific area and it has not been burning too long it might or might not damage the tank. Over the engine, it might burn through. On the turret, much less likely. Anywhere else and the tank armor might get thinned a bit, but it will not burn through.

In short, the most reliable method to get a thermite grenade onto a tank to try and burn through and disable it is up close and personal.

Not recommended.


21 posted on 03/06/2015 8:32:18 PM PST by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the muzlims trying to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl

I believe the thermite grenades may bounce once.


22 posted on 03/06/2015 8:34:26 PM PST by rfreedom4u (Do you know who Barry Soetoro is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rfreedom4u

What, the fuk are you talking about? You believe?


23 posted on 03/06/2015 8:37:37 PM PST by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl

1) piloting a drone from a distance using the on board camera is much more difficult than it looks

2) dropping anything, but especially a thermite grenade requires the drone be almost on top of the tank

3) drones are LOUD and can be easily located esp on a quiet night.

4) many small drones do not have that great of a range 400 m and WELL inside the range of any soviet tank.


24 posted on 03/06/2015 8:38:02 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl

The Rooskies trained dogs to carry bombs under German tanks. That seems a little sketchy in a lot of ways, but they had some success. Germans were shooting dogs on sight.
Maybe Ukranians could train their Democrats to do the same thing?


25 posted on 03/06/2015 8:40:45 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl
How about an RC quad copter with CCTV and TH3 [thermite] grenade? Hover over the tank's engine deck and drop the grenade. The U.S. M14 TH3 grenade burns at 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit and would easily burn through the steel engine deck and into engine. The molten metal would set the diesel fuel and oil afire. The fire will either immobilize or destroy the tank when it reaches the ammunition stowage.
26 posted on 03/06/2015 8:41:23 PM PST by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl

You have been reading too many “Patriot” books.


27 posted on 03/06/2015 8:42:38 PM PST by Vermont Lt (When you are inclined to to buy storage boxes, but contractor bags instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Dunno. Infantrymen used thermite grenades to disable German artillery pieces in WWII. Seems a logical step.


28 posted on 03/06/2015 8:48:54 PM PST by Hootowl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

My thought was that the Ukrainians need something inexpensive to counteract the Russian armor and it’s evident that our Fearless Leader is not inclined to provide them anything except rations.


29 posted on 03/06/2015 8:51:50 PM PST by Hootowl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl

Yep, Rangers on D-day disabling German cannon.


30 posted on 03/06/2015 8:52:21 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

You don’t have to drop it, you just kamakazi the drone with its thermite package into the tank. Drones cost a lot less than tanks.


31 posted on 03/06/2015 8:53:54 PM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl

Artillery pieces are not the same as tanks, and the armor on modern-day battle tanks is much tougher than anything available in WWII.


32 posted on 03/06/2015 8:57:00 PM PST by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the muzlims trying to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl

Well partner, I sure hope we helped you with your questions.
It looks like we covered them, then flat ran out of steam.


33 posted on 03/06/2015 9:30:18 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

“They defined the word pazerfaust as meaning “armor fist” but I am not sure they got it right.”

That’s correct, tank fist or armor fist. The weapon is a relatively lightweight man-portable recoilless gun. It was used to defeat tanks and other armored targets.


34 posted on 03/06/2015 9:31:33 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl

“My thought was that the Ukrainians need something inexpensive to counteract the Russian armor and it’s evident that our Fearless Leader is not inclined to provide them anything except rations”

The Ukrainians have/had PLENTY of cheap things capable of taking out tanks, from 50 years of Soviet production, that was stored in caches all over Ukraine. What they lack are soldiers with the will to stand and use them.


35 posted on 03/06/2015 9:43:58 PM PST by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

True. Savvy Russians commandeered the bed springs from as many beds as they could while moving west. A good layer of them on a tank would either keep the shaped charge from striking hard enough to go off, or have it go off far enough from the armor as to defeat the self forged penetrator.

Microsoft and Atomic games made some fantastic small unit games covering D-Day, Arnhem, The Eastern Front and the Battle of the Bulge (Close Combat series). Playing any of the latter three (East front later in war, and I don’t have the first) and you learn really fast that you are screwed taking armor into towns and villages with panzerfaust wielding defenders.

Unless I was really pressed for ammo, I usually would just level places and then mop up.

Arnhem (”Bridge to Far”) is ruthless, it is next to impossible to win that game playing the allies.


36 posted on 03/06/2015 11:08:47 PM PST by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

http://download.cnet.com/Close-Combat-II-A-Bridge-Too-Far/3000-7483_4-10013391.html


37 posted on 03/06/2015 11:16:13 PM PST by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl

Forget it - this isn’t your Daddy’s tank - modern Russian tanks are equipped with area protection systems which would make short work of your drone. See here for the specs:

ARENA-E Active Protection System for AFV
http://defense-update.com/20040221_arena-e.html#.VPrkKmZMGbg

“The system is designed to protect the tank from attacks of anti-tank guided missiles launched from the ground and by attack helicopter and lightweight anti-tank grenades (such as RPG).”


38 posted on 03/07/2015 3:44:28 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl

There was another method also. My neighbor a Veteran of house to house fighting in WWII said he and his platoon had actually disabled tanks using it. It was close quarter fighting within the cities and the visibility of the tanks was limited. He and his men would fire their Garand’s at the muzzle of the oncoming tank. He swore they had actually set the round off inside the barrel or put enough rounds into it to create enough of a barrier of loose rounds that the round trying to pass down the barrel would come in contact and create enough over pressure to blow the breech and disable the main gun. While true or not I don’t know but the Garand is more than capable of the accuracy needed to hit a 90 mm circle at less than 100 yards and debris inside the barrel of a weapon can have devastating results.


39 posted on 03/07/2015 5:11:37 AM PST by Dusty Road (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl

I agree. Not sure what the answer is though.


40 posted on 03/07/2015 8:14:26 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson