Damn, I really like your discussion but of course you forget the most important part... Blacks will always vote for blacks and women will for the most part always vote for women. So we are left with what is left.
Lets see, those that get money for nothing will vote for who? Okay, let’s say the Democrats because they do promise these things. Lets take the rest of the electorate and see how they stand...
Oh well, lets not as it will lead to the same conclusion, those that need will vote Democrat and those that supply those needs will vote Republican. Sometimes I think that that world is dividing into two groups, those that provide and those that take...hmmm. What will happen when those that provide decide to stop providing to those that take?
Can we call that going going Galt!
Whoever said they don’t vote for who they vote for? The problem for the democrats will be turn out. Not getting them to vote dem. My point is that the republicans have the same problem but have ignored it for some quixotic chase after votes they were never going to get anyway. They should have been working as hard to turn out their base as the democrats work to to out theirs. But the republicans don’t do that on purpose. They are socialists/commies at heart and are ashamed of their base. They would rather lose chasing after lib votes than win with conservatives principles. But if they can fool some conservatives into believing that republican = conservative, they will take that vote as long as they can still get to enact lib policies.