Posted on 03/04/2015 9:05:59 AM PST by Buckeye Battle Cry
That the New York Times broke this story on Hillary running State through off-the-record e-mail systems/servers is quite telling. Team Obama does not want Hillary succeeding Barack. He sees Elizabeth Warren as a much more worthy successor to his revolution.
Besides Obama detests Sid Vicious Blumenthal. That Hillary was using him as her de facto deputy at State must enrage Obama since Obama specifically dictated that Blumenthal is to have ZERO official dealings with HIS administration.
This scandal has legs specifically because El Jefe Obama wants it to. Hillary is in DEEP Kim Chee.
Your thoughts?
She’s been written off in the past and come back. I doubt this will be enough to drive a stake through her heart.
Team Obama and Team Clinton HATE each other with a seething passion.
The wicked witch/beyatch of the west, the underworld of demons.
ValJar and Moochelle must have other plans for the “first female president”
strange how these angry despicable women are running the US government more than Congress
He stopped her before, he can stop her again.
I don’t think anybody really cares about it. They also don’t really care about her. Which helps keep the story from having legs, a scandal about somebody nobody likes anymore isn’t really a scandal, it’s a footnote.
Only death would be her doom.
If/when Zero’s handlers decide they’ve gotten all they can out of him, they’ll dump him.
If they decide Hitlery is their new best operative, this story will disappear, as will anything else that might damage their agenda.
Hitlery is toast. The DNC doesn’t want her.
On the other hand, for what it's worth, I still don't think she's a lock for the nomination.
The Gowdy Committee knews about this long before the NY Times, and Gowdy was likely waiting until he could spring it with maximum effect. All of the sudden it is an expose’ the night before Netanyahu’s visit, and the DHS funding cave, two stories that would likely minimize the coverage of Hillary. The story is handled in such a way to minimize damage. NY Times is complicent in the treatment of the story, the Obama team likely went along, or they could have sprung it earlier.
Hillary is old, and represents the past.
The stigma of the Clintons cannot be removed.
Besides, she will collect more money on her listening tour and speeches and add that to her Clinton Foundation Retirement Fund.
It is clear that whomever put Obama in power is against the Clintons, and they want someone else in 2016, similar to how no one wants Jeb in 2016 on the GOP side.
While Fauxcahontas is seen as the next in line, I think it will be a less radical character—someone like a Martin O’Malley, ex-gov. of MD-—to be their new front man.
Good analysis.
We’ll know by mid year I believe.
The Clintons are the same as the Kennedy’s rules are for others and above the law Vince Foster winks.
Don't fool yourself - this country would vote Bill in for a 3rd time if they could.
The email scandal is another piece of evidence that she is corrupt. Anyone who cares knew that long ago.
It is my opinion that whoever wins the democrat party nomination will be totally lacking in integrity. Further, we have seen that someone like that can get elected (twice).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.