If I had believed that she deserved that I would have made that clear in my post.I've been around here long enough to be known as one that,in 41,000 posts over 10+ years,isn't shy about expressing his opinion and does so with some degree of literacy.
In my earlier post I didn't say a word about her deserving that so I don't *believe* she deserves it.
It's quite simple when you think about it.
Your post made it very clear that you felt the man did not deserve our respect. It was pretty clear to me that you found him to be dishonorable. And it is not much of an extension from that to feeling that his daughter deserved what she got.
If you have been around here for that long you should understand that comments like yours might be taken the wrong way. If I did, I apologize.
But to imply that CS was threatening people over the phone is as low as the comments made by the tweeters. Not justifiable, and just spreading rumors. Not classy at all for a long time freeper.
I've met many people who think there is some value, maybe courage or something, in the mere act of the expression of their opinion. As if having one is some sort of achievement. As if it's some reflection of honesty.
But sometimes it's equivalent to peeing on someone's cereal and, in response to their disgust, positing self-righteously, "Well! I've been known around here as being someone who is not afraid to piss on peoples' breakfasts. Why, some will note I've done it 41,000 times now." As if that in itself somehow makes their pissing special. Someone's piss might indeed be special, but pissing 41,000 times, if anything, means they just piss quite often.
Opinions in and of themselves, mine included, are, on average, especially unencumbered by a judicious self-review and backed by fact, practically mere bodily functions, at best a dime-a-dozen and at worst similar to the one you offered, including the ensuing defense.
That's just my opinion.