[Wayne07]

Interestingly, the 4 idiots in this case are Scalia, Thomas, Kagan, and Kennedy. By the word of the law, you’d probably agree with them. The law is incredibly stupid, the prosecution was pernicious, but the Supreme Court should stick to the law, and probably should have upheld the conviction.

[DiogenesLamp]

Interestingly, the 4 idiots in this case are Scalia, Thomas, Kagan, and Kennedy. By the word of the law, you’d probably agree with them. The law is incredibly stupid, the prosecution was pernicious, but the Supreme Court should stick to the law, and probably should have upheld the conviction.

I didn't read it, but naturally assumed it was the usual breakdown of the court. It is odd that Thomas and Scalia sided with Kagan, and Kennedy is an unpredictable weather-vane.

I would at least give Thomas and Scalia's opinions some consideration.

[1010RD]

It would seem that the fish is documenting the crime and thus evidence in the very least. I haven’t read the dissenting opinion or anything by Scalia who I don’t always agree with or Thomas who I mostly agree with. Have you?