Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Graybeard58

I wonder if filial responsibility laws can be used as a precedent for unborn person laws. Specifically, if you can force an immediate relative to provide for the needs or debts of others, then why shouldn’t a mother and father be required to provide care and feeding to an unborn child?


2 posted on 02/24/2015 12:39:33 PM PST by SpirituTuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SpirituTuo

Good question.


4 posted on 02/24/2015 12:44:37 PM PST by Graybeard58 ( For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SpirituTuo
I wonder if filial responsibility laws can be used as a precedent for unborn person laws. Specifically, if you can force an immediate relative to provide for the needs or debts of others, then why shouldn’t a mother and father be required to provide care and feeding to an unborn child?

Wow. Good thinking!

7 posted on 02/24/2015 12:46:04 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SpirituTuo

Sounds like Obamunism.


18 posted on 02/24/2015 1:04:25 PM PST by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson