If they were 'scars', as you vociferously claim, then why don't they show up in every photo of Zero's head? In the exact same locations. Every single time.
They clearly do not, as any casual perusal of his photos will show.
What's your theory to explain that? Is the NSA doctoring every online image of Zero? Come on. Prove your theory.
Will let's see, you want me to prove my theory without having to prove your theory, over photos that I cannot post because they'll be deleted by the mods, while dismissing (as absurd) the very concept that the government might be doctoring photos to hide evidence that the President may have once had brain surgery, because they simply wouldn't ever try to hide such a thing or confuse the evidence for it.
Just want to make your proposal clear here.
Hmm, let's see, what to do.
I know, I'll just say this (again): I think those are scars on Obama's head, and not parted hair marks perceptible only to black people with personal experience in nappy hair behavior that is simply unknown to white people.
That's it, that's what I'm doing, right there - I'm saying that.
Oh, and I'll say one more thing. I don't think the NSA is handling the photo evidence manipulation on the Obama head scar coverup mission. If I were to choose, I'd say that would fall to the NASA photo manipulators that faked the moon landings. Because in the same way they used the same background hills for all the faked moon photos, they're using the same background head for these faked nappy hair combing swirl lines. Gives it away right there, IMO.