Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: originalbuckeye

I’ve always considered them to be primarily the domain of Navy/Marines and bikers.

The “individuality” the bearer of a tattoo had in the past is washed out by it’s becoming a fad. Ironically, not having them seems to be more a sign of not being part of the “herd” now than having them.


42 posted on 02/22/2015 9:03:14 PM PST by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Axenolith
I’ve always considered them to be primarily the domain of Navy/Marines and bikers.

I recall catching flack in my riding days : "You can't be a biker, you don't have a tatoo!"

To which I replied, "I've never gone 120+ on a tatoo, either."

I just never saw anything I wanted to wear that long.

87 posted on 02/23/2015 1:53:17 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson