'Walking Dead' Producer Talks Spinoff, "Guns on the Street" and Killing Off Characters

Hollywood Reporter ^ | 02/16/2015 | by Stephen Galloway

[woodbutcher1963]

Plus, there is not a ammo store handy down the street to buy another couple hundred rounds anymore. Bullets are a precious commodity. However, Darrel seems to have an unlimited supply of arrows.

[july4thfreedomfoundation]

Maybe someone should remind Gale Turd that Australia doesn’t have millions of Mexican and Central American gang members killing each other, unlike the Los Angeles metropolitan area and other large cities.

Then there are the feral negro gang bangers......

You could always move overseas, Gale....who is stopping you?

[Dick Bachert]

Then, of course, we have THESE two idiot hypocrites.

[cripplecreek]

Most of Darrel’s shots are close range head shot so he wouldn’t lose many bolts as long as he has time to retrieve them.

Personally I would want a .22 rifle with stinger rounds. Its a relatively quiet gun that won’t leave your ears ringing after every shot and you can carry a LOT of rounds.

[woodbutcher1963]

They do show Darrel retrieving his “bolts” after most of his shots.

[PapaBear3625]

If you subtract black and Hispanic homicides, the US homicide rate is no different from Europe’s.

[driftdiver]

Once those doors close they will not reopen.

[PoloSec]

Typical progressive liberal democrat communist...

California alone has approx 15 million more people than Australia. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html

The population of Australia is approx 23 million; that is probably close to the actual number of illegal(all criminal)aliens in the U.S.

[j. earl carter]

The Walking Dead is the one [that's] different, and I found that it's inspired a debate about what does it mean to be human and can you justify resorting to this kind of brutality?”

See? She just wants to inspire debate. She doesn't want to portray pornagraphic levels of violence on her show. She has to portray this level of violence to show that guns, ninja swords, knives, crossbows, hammers, etc. are inherently deadly in the hands of humans in the absence of government.

You are speechless because you don't understand yet. It's comments like yours that force this woman to portray violence on tv.

[SamuraiScot]

We also have a tendency to list defensive killings with homicide and the left refuses to accept the distinction.

It's true that "homicide" is a confusing word, unless you're being careful. And anti-gun nuts have no interest in care or truth. A defensive killing is a homicide—one person killing another. It's a justifiable one. Accidental killings are also homicides, as are murders. Murders are the homicides you punish. Got that, liberals?

[longfellow]

Good one.