Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jjotto

“That’s quite a conspiracy theory given video, photos and stories about three vehicles involved.”
****************************************************************************************************

I was looking at the pictures on post 118 and making inferences about one (of many) possibilities. I’m very curious as to how TMZ got those pictures FROM THAT ANGLE. From those pictures I thought (incorrectly based on more information) that the car he ran into was stopped an intersection. I guess we’ll have to wait for the police investigation to be complete/released until we have all the facts.


186 posted on 02/07/2015 4:51:44 PM PST by House Atreides (CRUZ or lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]


To: House Atreides

You’re right about the photo angles being suspicious. I wonder how far away the cameras actually were. Papos can have some high end stuff.

I’m really interested in whether California’s ant-paparazzi laws will pin responsibility on paparazzi, though there seems little doubt about Jenner’s poor judgment.


188 posted on 02/07/2015 4:58:12 PM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

To: House Atreides

Yeah, it is a 4 lane highway there with apparently a turn lane in the middle (so 5 lanes) and yes, the white car was stopped.

But who is taking these photos at impact? Was one paparazzo on the side of the road by the beach?? Appears to have been shot from the other side of the opposing two lanes. How would they know an accident was going to happen there?


189 posted on 02/07/2015 5:04:34 PM PST by Yaelle (No Cruz? Then "I'm Ready for Hillary; What Difference Does It Make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson