In either case is is a matter of faith...I can neither prove or disprove one or the other of these.
Darwin’s theory is fairly well constructed and plausible...but it is still a matter of faith since it cannot be empirically proven.
God...well, again it’s a matter of faith. Can’t prove he does, cannot prove he doesn’t and all evidence to support is inconclusive and must be taken as a matter of faith.
Believe or don’t but these nitwits keep trying to prove that Darwin was right...my question to them then becomes: How do you know that evolution isn’t what God intended?
No Christian denies micro-evolution, that there are changes within species. There are dog breeds from Chihuahua to Great Dane, but they’re still dogs. It’s the macro-evolution thing, that dinos morphed into chickens, etc., that has no observable, repeatable scientific basis, no transitional forms, etc. There should be billions upon billions of such transitional forms for goo to you through the zoo to be true, but there’s not a single one that hasn’t been disputed.
In fact, a t-rex bone was recently found out west that was NOT permineralized (fossilized) and still had wet gelatinous heme in its marrow. After 65 million years. Riiiight.
Origins “science” is in reality a misnomer. Evolution purports to be “science,” but in reality is merely faith. Just like Christianity. They try to dress it up in scientific language, but it’s still just faith, as Ruse admitted.
The most “simple” of single-celled organisms is stupendously complex. It’s laughable to believe that complexity could’ve sprung from random processes. The formation of even a single protein via random processes has been likened to a solar system full of blind men all simultaneously solving the Rubik’s Cube. And that “simple” organism requires dozens of proteins, organelles, cytoplasm, a selectively permeable cell membrane and the most complex code in the world: DNA. Such faith!