Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seahawks ‘just don‘t understand’ the Super Bowl-losing play call
nypost.com ^ | February 2, 2015 | Paul Schwartz

Posted on 02/02/2015 4:04:53 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper

There were plenty of explanations offered, first by Seahawks coach Pete Carroll, then by offensive coordinator Darren Bevell and quarterback Russell Wilson, but at the end of Super Bowl XLIX, with everyone left breathless, the question still hanging out there along with the confetti falling on the victorious Patriots:

How in the world does Marshawn Lynch, as fearsome a runner as there is, not get the ball on second down from the New England 1-yard line in the final seconds?

“We had it,’’ Seahawks linebacker Bruce Irvin said. “I don’t know how you don’t give it to the best back in the league on not even the 1-yard line? We were on the half-yard line and we throw a slant. I don’t know what the offense had going on, what they saw. I just don’t understand.’’

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: carrollblowsit; choke; petespunksgetpunked; seachickenschoke; seahawks; superbowl; thugslose
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201 next last
To: dfwgator

.
That statement is correct, but the flub for the Pats was the penalty call.

Undisciplined players have a way of tilting the wheel of fate at the most inopportune moment. They get away with their infractions often when it is of little or no consequence, but fail to recognize why they invariably get caught when it does matter.

Glad they’re playing football rather than performing delicate surgery!

.


161 posted on 02/02/2015 10:07:51 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: chimera

They said that NE lined up with 8 down line men. they didn’t think it looked good for a run, so they thought let’s try for a pass, and if there’s a chance for a score pass otherwise throw it away.


162 posted on 02/02/2015 10:10:09 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
And remember, it was only 2nd down.

With a timeout remaining, too. Clock's not going to run out if Lynch is stopped on 2nd down, and Seattle could have stopped it after third down if need be.

163 posted on 02/02/2015 10:16:59 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: discostu

.
That view suggests a certain amount of cynicism WRT the motives of the officials, and I’m not saying that it is unwarranted, but the tendency on the part of the less seasoned members of the secondary to thoughtlessly run the moment the ball hits their fingers has caused many four-and-outs or worse at the goal line.

.


164 posted on 02/02/2015 10:19:12 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: sphinx
The quarterback threw a bad ball.

Differing opinion. It was a great defensive play. Had the defender got there a split second later, Seattle scores.

165 posted on 02/02/2015 10:20:17 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Had the intended receiver just deflected the ball away as he should have, the Seahawks would likely have scored on the next play.

(I’m not a Seahawks fan either)


166 posted on 02/02/2015 10:23:44 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963

They had one time out. A lot of people don’t realize that they couldn’t use that without invoking a penalty since they had just called a timeout.

There was a little bit of tactics going on even with the timeouts. From comments made, the Seahawks expected Belichick to call a timeout when there was about a minute left, to preserve time...but he didn’t - because he didn’t want to give Carroll more time to plan, and so the Seahawks coaching staff got a bit discombobulated.


167 posted on 02/02/2015 10:27:46 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: freedomlover

Woody Hayes was my recollection as well.


168 posted on 02/02/2015 10:31:54 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

The Pats subbed in a largely fresh line for that play...big bodies to jam up the line. Yes, Lynch was doing better in the second half, but he never dominated...and at 1-2 yards to go he was stuffed several times. Prior to the bobble play, the Patriots defense had held Seattle to 3 3-and-outs.

The Pats had two defenders on the side of the field where the pass was, with one of them occupied with a block. The Seahawks got the matchup they wanted, it just didn’t work...apparently because Butler was burned for a TD on the same play during a scrimmage this week with the scout team, and Belichick burned it into his brain. Butler didn’t even look at the defender.


169 posted on 02/02/2015 10:45:14 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: lepton

I guess that is why they compare the “hooded one” to the evil emperor from “Star Wars”.


170 posted on 02/02/2015 10:48:29 AM PST by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Yup. SIX defensive linemen, plus big linebackers Collins and Hightower.


171 posted on 02/02/2015 10:51:38 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: lepton
"The Pats subbed in a largely fresh line for that play...big bodies to jam up the line."

They had 6 defensive linemen in for the goalline play. I doubt all of them were "fresh" as a mainly 3/4 team like the Pats usually only carry about 6 defensive linemen. At least half of that line was tired out. As for the pass, okay, if you're going to pass on a goal line stand, why a pass in the middle where everyone is jammed up? The pass play to make right there would be to do a fade or something on the outside. Not on the inside where all the big bodies where. Just like the play that Brady threw to Edelman to go up. It was one on one to the outside.
172 posted on 02/02/2015 11:40:43 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Maybe not cynicism on motives so much as cynicism on the minutia of the game. We’ve all seen plenty of goal line catches right at the line called one way or the other based on an inch or so of ball position. Given the crowd on both sides of the catch there probably isn’t a replay that gives a definitive view (I certainly haven’t seen one) so if he kneels the play probably stands as a pick in the endzone and a touchback. But there is an old maxim of don’t give the refs a chance to see things differently. Once he got past the goal line which side he caught it on stopped mattering.


173 posted on 02/02/2015 11:41:44 AM PST by discostu (The albatross begins with its vengeance A terrible curse a thirst has begun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: lepton

In an interview this morning Butler said they’d practiced that play a bunch of times Friday, and they kept practicing it because he kept not getting around the pick to defend the pass. Which plays into why Belichick didn’t call a time out, if the Hawks lined up for exactly the play they’d practiced and knew they could stop don’t give Carroll a chance to change his mind.


174 posted on 02/02/2015 11:45:17 AM PST by discostu (The albatross begins with its vengeance A terrible curse a thirst has begun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Must really stink being a Seahawks fan.

And A Classless Seahawk Thug!

175 posted on 02/02/2015 11:46:01 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Maybe Carroll was gambling on Belichick burning his timeout when they lined up for that play.


176 posted on 02/02/2015 11:50:36 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Because sometimes jammed up plays in your favor. The design of the play is that the lead receiver picks the two defenders leaving the second receiver open for the TD. Which apparently the Pats understood and practiced against that play, so Butler knew he had to take a different line and not get picked. But if the Pats don’t spot Seattle’s fondness for that play in tape review, and Butler doesn’t read it properly pre-snap and adjust the way he’d been taught, there’s a little pocket of peace right there for the receiver and TD Seahawks.


177 posted on 02/02/2015 11:51:17 AM PST by discostu (The albatross begins with its vengeance A terrible curse a thirst has begun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Carroll said they were expecting it. And 99% of the time taking the timeout is the right move there. All the way up until they line up exactly the way you want them to.


178 posted on 02/02/2015 11:52:47 AM PST by discostu (The albatross begins with its vengeance A terrible curse a thirst has begun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Yep. That’s where Belichick outsmarted him. I myself was wondering why the Patriots weren’t taking the TOs to leave some time on the clock if Seattle scored, because all they would have needed was a FG to force overtime.

But by not taking them, it forced Seattle to consider abandoning the run.


179 posted on 02/02/2015 11:53:26 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: lepton
The defender just made an excellent play.

No argument to that anywhere. Butler sniffed it out. But as in politics, the premise caused the problem. The Seahawks SHOWED a pass play with an empty backfield. This is after a timeout. The PATs had to scramble because they had the run defense called. But all of that is a moot point. The play was way to risky for 2nd and goal from the 1 with 20 seconds on the clock and a timeout left.

That might have been the call on 4th down or even 3rd down if they stopped a run and had burnned a timeout.

By the way, I am a Colts fan. I was rooting for both teams to lose.

180 posted on 02/02/2015 12:08:53 PM PST by Tenacious 1 (POPOF. President Of Pants On Fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson