The SCOTUS is as corrupted as the rest of the govt. It started for me when they ruled a person’s private property could be taken through eminent domain and given to another private party. What was that 6-7 years ago?
If you are watching the mini series “Sons of Liberty” on the History channel the parallels from then to now will jump off the screen at you. The reset is coming.
“The SCOTUS is as corrupted as the rest of the govt. It started for me when they ruled a person’s private property could be taken through eminent domain and given to another private party. What was that 6-7 years ago?
If you are watching the mini series “Sons of Liberty” on the History channel the parallels from then to now will jump off the screen at you. The reset is coming.”
SCOTUS is a great deal more corrupt then the rest of Washington if you ask me. Theirs is simply a dictator like corruption of power, currently being bent by the leftist-Academic trained ‘legal community’ to enact brand new leftist law.
Put simply the current members of the Federal employees in black robes have no concept of written English outside of that given to them or not given to them by leftist ivy league universities like Harvet and Yale. You can quite imagination the political agenda that drives the lies and ideology they teach there. Most of which comes down to and depends upon ‘the Court law making theory’ which holds that they can build judgement solely upon what they think previous judgement said, that ‘opinion’ built upon ‘opinion’ is of course the ultimate creative tool with which you can and will build any ‘opinion’ you could possibly want.
This is what they call ‘law’ when it is not grounded in the text of a Constitution, but rather the corruption & abuse of those who have in the past claimed to rule under(or in this case over) that constitution.
It is of course a supreme subversion of the concept of a written constitution that actual makes such a constitution more a liability to liberty than a asset. That is of course why if there is to be any Constitutional convention reigning in the Federal court to either make them accountable to the States or utterly abolish their jurisdiction and capability to build such ‘opinions’ on other ‘opinions’ is supremely important, less nothing else done there to the written constitution could possibility matter when they ignore or rewrite it.
Slavery and the Dred Scott case comes mind.