To: SunkenCiv
You cannot get an ‘intense’ fire from a mud-and-straw building. The straw is encased in the mud, and the wooden beams will burn, but slowly.
‘Gee, this impact does not fit my scenario, so I will find a way to discredit it.’
5 posted on
01/09/2015 4:54:46 AM PST by
rstrahan
To: rstrahan; SunkenCiv; Sacajaweau
rstrahan:
"You cannot get an intense fire from a mud-and-straw building.
The straw is encased in the mud, and the wooden beams will burn, but slowly." You might want to consider some of the article's conclusions:
- "The composition of the scoria droplets was related to the local soil, not to soil from other continents, as one would expect from an intercontinental impact.
- "The texture of the droplets, thermodynamic modeling and other analyses showed the droplets were formed by short-lived heating events of modest temperatures, and not by the intense, high temperatures expected from a large impact event.
- "And in a key finding, the samples collected from archaeological sites spanned 3,000 years.
'If there was one cosmic impact,' Thy said, 'they should be connected by one date and not a period of 3,000 years.'. "
12 posted on
01/09/2015 5:18:08 AM PST by
BroJoeK
(a little historical perspective.)
To: rstrahan
Yeah, but wouldn’t haloes home owners had a house full of wood furniture, fine draperies, lots of clothes, all combustible? ; >)
The hypothesis of mud/straw walls being combustible is just stupid. Maybe they were doing large scale burn-offs of field stubble post-harvest like is done today.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson