Itr could be that the enormous value of “time-mass” compared to ordinary mass, is that “time-entanglement” is much stickier than quantum entanglement.
In fact, time-mass and time-entanglement may be the same thing.
Your comments on this subject are fascinating, thanks. I particularly liked your comments about time-entanglement. It seems like such a potentially fruitful approach. I wonder if anyone on the cutting edge of physics is thinking along the same lines?
After last night, I was daydreaming about momentum and ordinary kinetic energy, and trying to imagine an analog in time travel. It’s much more difficult to reverse one’s momentum in classical mechanics, particularly if the value is large, than give it a little boost in the forward direction. So it is with time travel: It’s as if we already have a huge forward “momentum” in time.
Challenge: Find an analog to Newton’s F=ma for time travel. Just trying to come up with the units is bending my brain more than it should be bent at my age. :-)
However, your “time-entanglement” is a much more interesting concept to me, but one I have almost zero chance of ever understanding since I don’t understand regular entanglement.