Anything COULD have happened. Especially when there’s no evidence.
We don’t convict a person based on what COULD HAVE happened. In the courts, or in a fair-minded person’s mind. What matters is evidence.
What woman would be blacked out for 2 days and not see a doctor to find out what had just happened? Did any of these women who were blacked out for these extended periods ever even think of seeing a doctor about it? Especially this Vanessa Williams who says she knows a drug when she experiences it because she experimented with drugs - how could she not visit a doctor about it, to find out what had just happened to her?
She went there in the afternoon? 24 hours would be the following afternoon - not 2 days later. This gal doesn’t say what the “brown drink” was - makes me wonder if she hasn’t yet decided whether she wants to say it’s coffee, or booze. If it was booze you’d think she would have known it was booze, and if it was booze and doubled the effect of the drug to a point of overdose, wouldn’t her body have had some effects from overdose?
brown drink could possibly be capuchino (sp).
capuchino would fit his alleged MO as reported by others.
drug could be quaalude. quaalude can be lethal when combined with alcohol.
not reporting immediately, web search rape shame and other posts on other threads.
not saying it did happen, but I would personally feel more comfortable defending BC if he first defended himself instead of hiding behind high priced flack PR and flack lawyers.
let’s ask this. why would BC hire high priced flack PR and flack lawyers when he could just step to the front porch and announce his innocence to the world for anyone to hear.
these flack PR and flack lawyers are not the type of lawyers that innocent people usually hire. these are the type of people you hire when you need to destroy someone else’s reputation in public to save your own reputation.
now up to 29 witnesses have come forward, knowing full well that they have world expert class PR flacks and lawyers arrayed against them, willing and able to check their high school boyfriends and girlfriends for any rumors of anything remotely sounding sexual about their personal histories and then releasing it to sordid news outlets like TMZ so BC apologists can say “there! she had a boyfriend and he got to 1st base with her when she was 12 and they did not even get married later!! what a slut!!! she probably asked for it!!! she is now discredited compared to the great and accomplished and politically persecuted conservative BC!!!”
News Flash: Testimony from a victim IS evidence. Prosecutors present victims’ testimony all the time at trial as their only evidence. It may not be the best evidence out there, but it is still considered evidence. The Sandusky case was prosecuted on many of the charges with victim testimony only. And guilty verdicts were handed down on all of them.