Skip to comments.
The The Darwin Awards: sex differences in idiotic behaviours: sex differences in idiotic behaviour
bmj ^
| 11 December 2014
| Ben Alexander Daniel Lendrem
Posted on 12/13/2014 8:40:19 AM PST by Brother Cracker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Brother Cracker
But the thing is...she lived. Granted, she said she couldn’t feel her face for an hour afterward. Therefore, NOT a Darwin candidate.
21
posted on
12/13/2014 10:16:53 AM PST
by
hoagy62
("Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered..."-Thomas Paine. 1776)
To: Brother Cracker
Without the testosterone fueled drive homo sapiens would still be living in caves.
22
posted on
12/13/2014 10:17:33 AM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
To: Brother Cracker
Somehow I think this paper should have been published in the Journal of Irreproducible Results. Nevertheless, the statistical analysis seems to have been done properly.
23
posted on
12/13/2014 10:17:54 AM PST
by
JoeFromSidney
(Book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. Available from Amazon.)
To: Brother Cracker
There are always exceptions to the rule. Good thing she was drunk, that probably would’ve hurt.
To: mountn man
Railroad crossing gates are the last bastion of natural selection.
25
posted on
12/13/2014 10:27:20 AM PST
by
Dawggie
To: Brother Cracker
To: SWAMPSNIPER
27
posted on
12/13/2014 10:46:55 AM PST
by
Brother Cracker
(You are more likely to find krugerrands in a Cracker Jack box than 22 ammo at Wal-Mart)
To: hoagy62
28
posted on
12/13/2014 10:48:38 AM PST
by
Brother Cracker
(You are more likely to find krugerrands in a Cracker Jack box than 22 ammo at Wal-Mart)
To: Sherman Logan
Ha!
My first thought was “Find the Foreman!”
To: Brother Cracker
See this is why I can’t believe in Darwin
IF Darwin was right?
How soon would we run out of rednecks to ask you to hold their beer?
30
posted on
12/13/2014 11:38:10 AM PST
by
tophat9000
(An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
To: JoeFromSidney
Yes. Excellent comment.
There’s something a bit troubling about this whole article being published in BMJ.
It’s not a serious article - ie except for statistics, it’s not scientific.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
