Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cld51860

In the past 20 years or so, there have been slews of books by homo authors who read “gay subtexts” into EVERY imagineable old movie. Even things like the Universal monster movies, where the Frankenstein monster is supposed to be some kind of symbol of being a homosexual outcast! The insanity is endless. They have it encompassing everything.

And I even see it every time I venture over to the Internet Movie Database, where submitted old-movie reviews by dingbats will invariably refer to any character played by unglamourous or semi-homely character actresses like Aline MacMahon, Agnes Moorehead and such, as automatically indicative of a “lesbian subtext.” It’s just mind-bogglingly insane. I think this craziness is being circulated throughout academic/college circles, like a lot of other weird liberal-tinged historical revisionism, and young minds are buying it all up, and perpetuating it further, in their internet postings.


28 posted on 12/04/2014 11:01:03 AM PST by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: greene66
Look up James Barrie's life, though.

His fascination with the Llewelyn Davies boys was certainly not healthy, even if nothing explicitly physical occured.

46 posted on 12/04/2014 2:33:54 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson