Probably. Hoke's Michigan winning percentage is significantly worse than Pellini's at Nebraska (about 61% vs. 72%), and what makes it worse for Michigan fans is that Michigan's decline (a putrid 5-7 this year and no bowl game) is coming at the same time arch-rivals OSU and MSU are dominant.
But Hoke scores better than Pellini in intangibles: personality, media relations, high graduation rates of players, low off-the-field problems with players.
But Hoke scores better than Pellini in intangibles: personality, media relations, high graduation rates of players, low off-the-field problems with players.
...you mean like Frank Clark, Brendan Gibbons, and Taylor Lewan...?