Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obamacare Exchange Subsidies Headed to U.S. Supreme Court
American Legislator ^ | 11-7-14 | Sean Riley

Posted on 11/07/2014 1:50:24 PM PST by ThethoughtsofGreg

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments against the availability of exchange subsidies under the Affordable Care Act. Today’s order from the Court granted review in King v. Burwell, one of several cases challenging IRS regulations extending tax-credit subsidies to the states with federal exchanges. Briefings will be submitted over the next few months, and a ruling is not expected until June.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanlegislator.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: aca; halbig; healthcare; indiana; king; obamacare; scotus

1 posted on 11/07/2014 1:50:24 PM PST by ThethoughtsofGreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg

The law is written in simple English...and it’s very clear....only state exchanges get subsidies. You have to read the exact wording. The media is leaving a piece of the sentence out.


2 posted on 11/07/2014 1:55:21 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg

Informed commentary and all court filings and judicial opinions are available here:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelcannon/2014/11/07/king-halbig-et-al-head-to-the-supreme-court/

http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelcannon/2014/08/04/the-halbig-cases-compendium-of-news-opinion-coverage/


3 posted on 11/07/2014 2:03:50 PM PST by Ray76 (We must destroy the Uniparty or be destroyed by them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

SCOTUS ping.


4 posted on 11/07/2014 2:12:04 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg
As one whose cynicism only grows with every session of the Supreme Court, I think it is of no harm whatsoever for the vote of Chief Justice Roberts that Obama has been dealt a drubbing and partly for The Affordable Care Act.


5 posted on 11/07/2014 2:13:11 PM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

All bets are off when it comes to SCOTUS. Ever since Marbury v Madison, the Supreme Court has assumed powers implied in the constitution. There is no reason that today, the Supremos couldn’t add a little bit of legislative editing to its powers.


6 posted on 11/07/2014 6:06:14 PM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est. President zero gave us patient zero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
The law is written in simple English...and it’s very clear....only state exchanges get subsidies. You have to read the exact wording. The media is leaving a piece of the sentence out.

Just as lawyers usually use a form of gibberish to hide the true meaning of words, Roberts has been known to translate clear English into gibberish - else the ObamaCare deal would be next to dead by now.

7 posted on 11/08/2014 2:41:26 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; Salvation; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

8 posted on 11/08/2014 9:21:53 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson