To: upbeat5
I would like to have an S&W .50 cal. but I can think of few real uses for it.
If I had one, I would download it to a bit more power than a .44 mag. A model 29 or Ruger Super Blackhawk in .44 mag do not bother me but I really don’t want much more recoil.
It would make a good pickup truck gun, again with milder but still powerful hand loads.
7 posted on
10/29/2014 5:55:49 PM PDT by
yarddog
(G)
To: yarddog
I have thought about the .500, and have fired one. I would probably obtain the .460 magnum, built on the same frame.
The major reason I would want one is that they are extremely well made revolvers. They have to be to give the performance that they do.
10 posted on
10/29/2014 6:10:14 PM PDT by
marktwain
(The old media must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
To: yarddog
You could become a lumberjack?
11 posted on
10/29/2014 6:11:46 PM PDT by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
To: yarddog
I would like to have an S&W .50 cal. but I can think of few real uses for it.
For me, it is too easy to take a deer with a long gun with today's optics. The new challenge will be my S&W 500. I will get my chance this year in south Texas.
27 posted on
10/29/2014 9:38:41 PM PDT by
jy8z
(When push comes disguised as nudge, I do not budge.)
To: yarddog
I would like to have an S&W .50 cal. but I can think of few real uses for it.Here's a .50 caliber revolver that might be more practical: Freedom Arms .500 Wyoming Express
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson