To: BenLurkin
Unless it was sucked into an engine, what kid of damage could one do? Just curious, but aren’t those things pretty small? I would think a goose would be a bigger danger???????
3 posted on
10/26/2014 2:16:02 PM PDT by
Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
(Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
Dunno, but I agree. Looking for a engine “bird strike” is the terrorist’s best bet.
5 posted on
10/26/2014 2:21:39 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
Remote shrapnel bomb, mercury dribbler to dissolve an aircraft in flight, pass blinder..
9 posted on
10/26/2014 2:31:36 PM PDT by
Darksheare
(People who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
Laser blinder..
Stupid smertfoan doesn’t know laser?
Keeps “correcting” it as pass.
10 posted on
10/26/2014 2:33:33 PM PDT by
Darksheare
(People who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
The leading edges of all surfaces are reinforced so a strike would be localized damage. If it was sucked in to an engine it would most likely damage the fan blades costing a lot to fix and ground the plane for repairs. But nothing catastrophic would happen. (Recovering aircraft engineer)
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
They are capable of carrying explosives and shrapnel.
17 posted on
10/26/2014 5:55:34 PM PDT by
lormand
(Inside every liberal is a dung slinging monkey)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson