Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What do you think will be the grand jury verdict concerning Officer Darren Wilson?
10/21/2014 | Laissez-faire Capitalist

Posted on 10/21/2014 11:46:32 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last
To: fatnotlazy
I say, no indictment, whereupon Holder will find some other charges to stick on him.

That's a good point.I personally think that the MO grand jury will indict...at least partially out of fear.But if I'm wrong we all can be *damn* sure that Obola will see to it that he's indicted.

81 posted on 10/21/2014 1:24:09 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Islamopobia:The Irrational Fear Of Being Beheaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Call me naïve, but I think the GJ will go by the evidence and there will be no charges.


82 posted on 10/21/2014 1:25:06 PM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!",)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

In order to prevent more rioting .....


83 posted on 10/21/2014 1:27:30 PM PDT by SkyDancer (I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

no indictment...go home.


84 posted on 10/21/2014 1:27:47 PM PDT by terycarl (common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

My prediction - the feds are given a heads up that it’s a no bill. The feds ask for and get timing of release on their schedule. At the same presser wher the DA announced the GJ no-billed the case, the DOJ announces it is charging Wilson.


85 posted on 10/21/2014 1:29:52 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
I supported Zimmerman who turned out to have his own problems. But his attorney said that the lives of those who survive these trials and verdicts are tough. Hard to get a job or a place to live. Living in constant fear, never knowing who to trust.
The utter foolishness lies in the fact that NBC seems to be walking. They broadcast a record of his call to the police before the altercation. But they edited out an answer and then a question - which portrayed Zimmerman as a blatant racist, and is a technique which could be used to portray anyone as practically any thing. Zimmerman sued for a paltry $2million, and AFAIK that suit isn’t even going forward.

He should have sued the AP and its membership for the environment in which it was possible to do such a thing, and possible for people to call for vigilante action against Zimmerman without repercussions. And he should have sued NBC specifically for enough to make himself, his lawyer, and all of his friends and family independently wealthy.

It is not to be forgotten that Zimmerman is a Democrat.

86 posted on 10/21/2014 1:31:20 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

With Obola, Holder, Jackson and Sharpton all sitting on their heads, I say they hand down an indictment.


87 posted on 10/21/2014 1:35:01 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spel_grammer_an_punct_polise
No bill but the grand jury has been told by the ‘powers-that-be’ to wait until the lynch mob in Ferguson loses interest and stops the ‘protests’.

Al $harpton is going back to Ferguson on Halloween to stir up the natives again, so that puts off the decision a while longer.

88 posted on 10/21/2014 1:36:55 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I can hear the tinkle of broken glass now.

Christmas comes early to Ferguson, MO.


89 posted on 10/21/2014 1:40:24 PM PDT by ~Peter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
-- Call me naive, but I think the GJ will go by the evidence and there will be no charges. --

Every single time I've followed a hot potato case, where the decision was a slam dunk, whoever was charged with rendering the decision did the opposite of what the law directs. Bush v. Gore and the SCOFLA; Zimmerman vs. Angela Corey; Obama and Honduras - those off the top of my head.

Just saying you can pretty reliably throw "going by the evidence" out the window. The decision is made without regard to the evidence and law, and the explanation is crafted (in an attempt to conform it to the evidence) later.

Using that approach, I still come out that the local politics doesn't support a local indictment. Especially not when the feds are camped out, willing to do the dirty work.

90 posted on 10/21/2014 1:40:26 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Zimmerman sued. His suit ws dismissed by the court.


91 posted on 10/21/2014 1:43:17 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

We have no idea what the witnesses actual testimony was. We only know what they said when interviewed by press or what they posted on twitter. Making a statement under oath with penalties of perjury and having to answer direct questions about their testimony can have an affect on a person.


92 posted on 10/21/2014 1:43:39 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Well, there are big differences between Zimmerman and this case. When Angela Corey was appointed the fix was in against GZ. I don’t think a special prosecutor has ever been appointed and not come down with an indictment. No special prosecutor has been appointed here. The default for the system is to let LEOs off, unless the political class decides to throw them under the bus. I don’t see that happening here.


93 posted on 10/21/2014 1:49:57 PM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!",)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

You and I are in agreement on the outcome. My point was that hot potato cases are not decided on the merits.


94 posted on 10/21/2014 1:51:07 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Obola needs a No Bill.
There is nothing else he can do gin up turnout.
95 posted on 10/21/2014 1:54:36 PM PDT by TxAg1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
I honestly don’t know if the eyewitness testomony of any five anywhere should be considered more trustworthy than one (I am going by the principle of relying on the parts that multiple people agree upon and tossing out what they dont agree upon) or if one person’s testimony is better than 5 which agree on some parts, but not all parts.

Red herring argument. The issue is not who killed Brown. Everyone agrees who killed Brown.

The issue is did the officer fear for his life or the lives of others. According to the leaked testimony, the officer was attacked in his car and his gun was discharged twice during the fight. This alone would indicate that Brown is dangerous and life threatening to the cop and others. The only one who knows for sure how the officer felt is the officer. However, the circumstances by which Brown was shot are consistent with displaying an aggression that most people would agree that the officer was in danger for his life. In addition, those witnesses you reference all agree on one thing..that Brown was approaching the officer when he was shot and the officer was backing up while shooting. That is not the original story that Brown was being executed while kneeling on ground. That is the description of a man who was aggressive just seconds ago being aggressive again.

96 posted on 10/21/2014 1:56:19 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
I say, no indictment, whereupon Holder will find some other charges to stick on him.

The leak from the DOJ is they found no civil rights violations. They never said that about Zimmerman.

97 posted on 10/21/2014 1:59:01 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Obama will have the decision held until after the midterms.

The decision will be announced on the following Saturday morning after the Friday evening news dump that announces the amnesty executive order and Ebola martial law.


98 posted on 10/21/2014 2:24:02 PM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I think he will face baseless charges in MO.


99 posted on 10/21/2014 2:34:29 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

They will be to afraid for their lives to no bill him so will pass the buck to a judge and jury.


100 posted on 10/21/2014 3:06:28 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson